1993
DOI: 10.3109/00016349309021130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a new Swedish protocol for alloimmunization screening during pregnancy

Abstract: Screening protocols for alloimmunization during pregnancy usually make a difference between primi- and multigravidae as well as between Rh(D) negative and Rh(D) positive pregnant women. We have evaluated a new screening program including antibody tests at 25 and 35 gestational weeks only, for all, and regardless of Rh(D) group. During the time period 1983-89, 78,300 consecutive pregnancies were tested. Red cell antibody immunizations were detected in 287 (0.37%) pregnancies subdivided into fourteen different r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have retrospectively studied all alloimmunizations in the central west region of Sweden during a 14‐year period. The incidence of alloimmunization was 0.4% and this incidence is in agreement with earlier reports (1, 2). The alloimmunization panorama during pregnancy has obviously not changed significantly during the last 15 years.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We have retrospectively studied all alloimmunizations in the central west region of Sweden during a 14‐year period. The incidence of alloimmunization was 0.4% and this incidence is in agreement with earlier reports (1, 2). The alloimmunization panorama during pregnancy has obviously not changed significantly during the last 15 years.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Even in the age of prophylactic treatment with immune globulin, immunization with anti-D antibody in pregnant women still occurs. The observed prevalence of anti-D immunization in this nationwide cohort from 1982–2002 was 14.1/10,000 births, comparable with previous regional estimates of 14.2/10,000 in 1980–1991 [6] and 12.6/10,000 in 1983–1989 [12]. Although we limited our analysis to data from regions that had achieved a sustained high coverage rate, similar prevalence estimates were obtained from all available data, suggesting that reporting bias is not a serious concern.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We support the recommendation put forward by Wong et al (1997) that routine antenatal antibody screening may not be worth considering for those Rh(D)-positive Chinese women who do not have any history of HDN in their previous pregnancy. Indeed, the current routine antenatal antibody screening practice in most Western countries may not be directly applicable to Chinese community (Davis & Abbott, 1986;Gottvall et al, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%