2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.11.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a recombinant cathepsin L1 ELISA and comparison with the Pourquier and ES ELISA for the detection of antibodies against Fasciola hepatica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, this phenomenon was not limited to the samples investigated in this study, nor to the expression of rpFhCLs in E. coli. In agreement with this, a similar finding was recently reported in a study where the performance of an indirect ELISA based on a rFhpCL1 expressed in the yeast Pichia pastoris was compared with that of a commercial indirect ELISA test containing a purified fraction from Fasciola ESAs (f2 antigen; Institute Pourquier, Montpellier, France) (Kuerpick et al 2013). Cross-reactivity was also observed by Cornelissen et al (2001) who tested sera from sheep and cattle harboring other parasites, mainly nematodes, suggesting that the cross-reactivity may be due to common epitopes between recombinant Fasciola cathepsins and antigens present in other parasites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, this phenomenon was not limited to the samples investigated in this study, nor to the expression of rpFhCLs in E. coli. In agreement with this, a similar finding was recently reported in a study where the performance of an indirect ELISA based on a rFhpCL1 expressed in the yeast Pichia pastoris was compared with that of a commercial indirect ELISA test containing a purified fraction from Fasciola ESAs (f2 antigen; Institute Pourquier, Montpellier, France) (Kuerpick et al 2013). Cross-reactivity was also observed by Cornelissen et al (2001) who tested sera from sheep and cattle harboring other parasites, mainly nematodes, suggesting that the cross-reactivity may be due to common epitopes between recombinant Fasciola cathepsins and antigens present in other parasites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…These molecules were selected since (i) they are produced by adult flukes and thus continue stimulating the immune system during the chronic phase of the illness, and (ii) Fasciola cathepsins L1, L2, and L5 contain a common epitope recognized by mAb MM3, which is the capture antibody in the MM3-SERO ELISA (Mezo et al 2007). Although rFhpCLs from the L1 clade have already been successfully used to develop a very sensitive and specific lateral flow test for immunodiagnosis of human fascioliasis , as well as to design ELISA tests for human (O'Neill et al 1999;Carnevale et al 2001a, b;Gonzales Santana et al 2013;Gottstein et al 2014) and animal use (Cornelissen et al 2001;Kuerpick et al 2013;Selemetas et al 2014;Bloemhoff et al 2015), the performance of rFhpCLs from L2 and L5 clades as ELISA targets has not previously been investigated. From a functional point of view, a single amino acid substitution may be sufficient to affect substrate specificity in cysteine proteases from F. hepatica (Smooker et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is different to what has been reported in the literature regarding the use of this antigen. Kuerpick and colleagues [ 22 ] observed two false positive results out of 13 animals infected with D. viviparus and one out of four animals infected with C. oncophora (sensitivity between 90–100 %, specificity 88.6 %). Cornelissen et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generally high handling costs as well as the necessity to sample several animals led to the increased use of serological methods which can be used for herd health monitoring. Serological diagnosis of F. hepatica has been described in the literature using excretory/secretory (ES) products [ 21 23 ], a “f2” antigen (Fasciolosis Verification Test, IDEXX, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands) and a recombinant Cathepsin L1 antigen [ 22 ]. The same applies for D. viviparus where the detection of antibodies in serum or milk using ELISAs with either crude ES antigen [ 24 – 26 ] or recombinantly expressed major sperm protein (MSP) [ 27 29 ] has been described.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…no. ) was linked to a 6x His‐tag, inserted into the expression vector pPinkα‐HC (Invitrogen) and electroporated into the yeast Pichia pastoris as described . PCR with subsequent commercial Sanger sequencing (Seqlab Sequence Laboratories, Göttingen, Germany) verified the correct insert sequence of selected clones.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%