2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a systems ergonomics-based incident reporting system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many benefits of having strong occupational health and safety practices in place. For example, it can help to reduce workplace accidents and injuries [24][25] [26][27] [28][29] [30], which can lead to a decrease in lost work time and increased productivity. It can also improve employee morale and job satisfaction, as workers feel that their employer cares about their well-being.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many benefits of having strong occupational health and safety practices in place. For example, it can help to reduce workplace accidents and injuries [24][25] [26][27] [28][29] [30], which can lead to a decrease in lost work time and increased productivity. It can also improve employee morale and job satisfaction, as workers feel that their employer cares about their well-being.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LOAs in Australia are conducted with low levels of negative incidents, despite the increased risk. This is because safety controls are in place in most cases to prevent accidents [66,67] and the accident rate for people participating in LOAs is 2 per 1000 participants with minor severity [67]. This example suggests that formal incident reporting prevents future events [68][69][70].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, decisions and actions which are (or are not) taken by actors at all levels within a systems hierarchy influence the overall behavior of a system (Ottino, 2003; Rasmussen, 1997). The AcciMap method has been applied to identify and/or map the contributory factors in cycling crashes (Salmon, Naughton et al, 2022; Salmon, Stanton et al 2022), community rugby concussions (Clacy et al, 2019), food supply contamination (Cassano-Piche et al, 2009; Nayak & Waterson, 2016), and outdoor activity incidents (McLean et al, 2022; Salmon et al, 2017). Based on the rationale of the RMF and AcciMap method, as well as evidence from other domains, CSA in sport is likely influenced by the decisions and actions of multiple actors across sport systems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%