2023
DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2023.3282216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a Vibrotactile Biofeedback System Targeting Stance Time Symmetry Ratio of Individuals With Lower-Limb Amputation: A Pilot Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have only compared symmetry changes when inducing symmetry (in patient groups) or asymmetry (in healthy groups) using a single target level [ 11 , 12 , 14 , 23 , 30 ]. However, this study investigated multiple target levels to further understand the symmetry changes at those different targets using the same biofeedback strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies have only compared symmetry changes when inducing symmetry (in patient groups) or asymmetry (in healthy groups) using a single target level [ 11 , 12 , 14 , 23 , 30 ]. However, this study investigated multiple target levels to further understand the symmetry changes at those different targets using the same biofeedback strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the challenges associated with other biofeedback strategies (e.g., corrective) is the adverse effect of STSR-based biofeedback on speed and cadence. Escamilla-Nunez et al compared three different corrective biofeedback strategies (sensory stimulation is provided only when an individual is out of a certain range) to induce TGA, resulting in symmetry changes of up to 0.10 and 0.05 on average for able-bodied individuals [ 30 ] and lower-limb amputees [ 14 ], respectively. However, the symmetry changes came at a cost, as the average walking speed and cadence significantly decreased by 20% and 15%, respectively [ 14 , 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations