2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of aggregate stability methods for soil health

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Soil aggregate stability was affected by several factors, one of which is soil organic matter. Similarly, Rieke et al (2022) reported that soil aggregate stability was positively correlated with soil organic C, indicating that increasing soil organic C was followed by increasing soil aggregate stability. The KL treatment had high soil organic matter; therefore, the soil aggregate was more stable.…”
Section: Available Water Capacitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Soil aggregate stability was affected by several factors, one of which is soil organic matter. Similarly, Rieke et al (2022) reported that soil aggregate stability was positively correlated with soil organic C, indicating that increasing soil organic C was followed by increasing soil aggregate stability. The KL treatment had high soil organic matter; therefore, the soil aggregate was more stable.…”
Section: Available Water Capacitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Thus, the results did not support the study hypotheses. Rieke et al (2022) highlighted that in addition to the sensitivity to detect changes in soil aggregate stability due to management practices, factors such as cost and user needs should be considered when selecting a suitable aggregate stability method for a given study. Findings showed that like the DAS method, the SLAKES method could not detect aggregate stability status of the treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fine et al (2017) also observed higher mean for WAS for coarse-textured soils compared to medium-and finetextured soils, and they suggested that better physical protection from raindrop impact is provided by coarse sand-sized particles. Recently, Rieke et al (2022) reported that WAS is influenced by sand content, and this may be attributed to the sand correction in the method. Consistent with other studies, significant differences were observed between mediumtextured and clay-textured soils, and between coarse-textured and clay-textured soils for PR15 and PR45 (Table 2; Grunwald et al 2001;Fine et al 2017).…”
Section: Soil Texture Effects On Scoring Function Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%