2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2019.101537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of algorithms for Multi-Modality Whole Heart Segmentation: An open-access grand challenge

Abstract: HighlightsThis work presents the methodologies and evaluation results for the WHS algorithms selected from the submissions to the Multi-Modality Whole Heart Segmentation (MM-WHS) challenge, in conjunction with MICCAI 2017.This work introduces the related information to the challenge, discusses the results from the conventional methods and deep learning-based algorithms, and provides insights to the future research.The challenge provides a fair and intuitive comparison framework for methods developed and being … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
207
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(214 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
6
207
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare the performance of different multi-modal learning methods, including two state-of-the-art approaches [9], [15]. We also refer to the available winning performance of the challenge [36], [38] to demonstrate effectiveness of multi-modal learning.…”
Section: Segmentation Results and Comparison With State-of-the-artsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compare the performance of different multi-modal learning methods, including two state-of-the-art approaches [9], [15]. We also refer to the available winning performance of the challenge [36], [38] to demonstrate effectiveness of multi-modal learning.…”
Section: Segmentation Results and Comparison With State-of-the-artsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Task-1: We perform multi-class cardiac structure segmentation using the MICCAI 2017 Multi-Modality Whole Heart Segmentation Challenge [36] dataset, which consists of unpaired 20 CT and 20 MRI images from different patients and sites. The multi-class segmentation includes four structures: left ventricle myocardium (LVM), left atrium blood cavity (LAC), left ventricle blood cavity (LVC) and ascending aorta (AA).…”
Section: A Datasets and Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Zreik et al (2016) proposed a two-step LV segmentation process where a bounding box for the LV is first detected using the method described Table 4. For more details, please refer to Zhuang et al (2019).…”
Section: Cardiac Substructure Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reported numbers are Dice scores (CT/MRI) for different substructures on both CT and MRI scans. For more detailed comparisons, please refer toZhuang et al (2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, convolutional neural networks (CNN) based approaches have been proposed to segment the LA and PV [12] [13] [14][15] [16] and a grand challenge has been held for LA anatomy segmentation [17]. These research studies on LA anatomy segmentation can potentially be useful for LA scars segmentation although to the best of our knowledge, this has not been done to date.…”
Section: Segmentation Of the La Anatomymentioning
confidence: 99%