2020
DOI: 10.1159/000511042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an Automatic Speech Recognition Platform for Dysarthric Speech

Abstract: <b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The use of commercially available automatic speech recognition (ASR) software is challenged when dysarthria accompanies a physical disability. To overcome this issue, a mobile and personal speech assistant (mPASS) platform was developed, using a speaker-dependent ASR software. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the proposed platform and to compare mPASS recognition accuracy to a commercial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With dysarthric ASR, SD and SA approaches are more favorable due to the increased speech variability between different dysarthric individuals and the existing data scarcity problem significantly impacting the performance of SI dysarthric ASR. Among SD and SA dysarthric ASR, SA seems to be more on-demand lately as the SI system can be initially trained using normal speech and then adopt to individual speakers with dysarthria [5].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With dysarthric ASR, SD and SA approaches are more favorable due to the increased speech variability between different dysarthric individuals and the existing data scarcity problem significantly impacting the performance of SI dysarthric ASR. Among SD and SA dysarthric ASR, SA seems to be more on-demand lately as the SI system can be initially trained using normal speech and then adopt to individual speakers with dysarthria [5].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences make acoustic modeling components in standard ASR systems ineffective in mapping dysarthric speech signals to phonemes correctly; they need to deal with challenges caused by unusual and imprecise phonation, tempo and speed inconsistencies, sonorants random shifting of formant frequencies, etc. Thus, normal speech recognition systems have shown poor performance in recognizing dysarthric speech [5]. A review conducted in [6] suggests that while state-of-the-art normal ASR systems perform well on mild dysarthria, the performance degrades significantly as the condition worsens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ej., Flácida, espástica, mixta, hipercinética) y niveles de gravedad, todos los cuales son desafíos para que los algoritmos informáticos administren de manera efectiva. Se han documentado tasas altas de reconocimiento del habla (80% y más) principalmente para aquellos con disartria leve (Calvo et al, 2020). Aunque el uso del reconocimiento de voz por parte de personas sin impedimentos del habla ha aumentado como resultado de aplicaciones basadas en el consumidor como Alexa o Siri.…”
Section: Técnicas De Reconocimiento Del Hablaunclassified
“…Since dysarthria is a frequent symptom of speech disorder, it has to be identified and diagnosed in the early stage itself. Assessment and classification of dysarthria gained significant importance because of the need to understand the variety of impairment results in speech disorder [4] and to develop speech and language therapy which can be used to encourage the patients to improve their communication skills. Many works had been carried out to identify the dysarthria speech and the level of severity in the dysarthria by extracting features like MFCC [5], LPC [6], Log RASTA PLP [7], Centroid Formants [8], glottal features [9], Perceptually Enhanced Single Frequency Cepstral Coefficients [10], and Spectro -temporal sparsity features extracted through STFT with Mel warping and Single Frequency Filtering [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%