2013
DOI: 10.1071/an12335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an electronic system for automatic calving detection on a dairy farm

Abstract: Precise calving monitoring is important for reducing the effects of dystocia in cows and calves. The C6 birth control system is an electronic device that detects the time of the expulsion phase during calving. Several 53 Holstein were fitted on Day 280 ± 5 of gestation with the C6 birth control system, which was left in place until confirmation of calving. Sensitivity and PPV of the system were calculated as 100 and 95%, respectively. The partum events occurring at the group fitted with the system where compar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Near-continuous observation of preparturient mares is extremely labour-intensive, and time requirements would be markedly reduced with automated monitoring systems. In cattle, automated monitoring and alert systems are used for oestrous detection (Chanvallon et al, 2014;Pennington, Albright, & Callahan, 1986;Roelofs, van Eerdenburg, Soede, & Kemp, 2005) and health management (Borchers, Chang, Tsai, Wadsworth, & Bewley, 2016;Müller & Schrader, 2003) and are also increasingly advocated for monitoring of cows before calving (Krieger et al, 2017;Marchesi et al, 2013;Ouellet et al, 2016). Monitoring devices in cattle are often made for long-term recordings and are fixed permanently on the animal whereas for birth alert, pedometers (Nishimura et al, 2017;Titler et al, 2015) or intravaginal sensors (Palombi et al, 2013) are used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Near-continuous observation of preparturient mares is extremely labour-intensive, and time requirements would be markedly reduced with automated monitoring systems. In cattle, automated monitoring and alert systems are used for oestrous detection (Chanvallon et al, 2014;Pennington, Albright, & Callahan, 1986;Roelofs, van Eerdenburg, Soede, & Kemp, 2005) and health management (Borchers, Chang, Tsai, Wadsworth, & Bewley, 2016;Müller & Schrader, 2003) and are also increasingly advocated for monitoring of cows before calving (Krieger et al, 2017;Marchesi et al, 2013;Ouellet et al, 2016). Monitoring devices in cattle are often made for long-term recordings and are fixed permanently on the animal whereas for birth alert, pedometers (Nishimura et al, 2017;Titler et al, 2015) or intravaginal sensors (Palombi et al, 2013) are used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of animals that had to be culled was three times higher in the group with the longer retention time than in the group with the shorter retention time (33.0 % vs. 10.1 %, P≤0.05). In contrast to [5], who tested the birth monitoring device C6, the iVET ® system was not well tolerated by all heifers and caused irritation and discomfort to the heifer which may lead to neuro-hormonal alterations of the birth process. This could be one reason for the high percentage of dystocia and injuries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Many researchers claimed that sensitive accelerometers can detect subtle differences which appear in the behavior of cows in early disease states. The most frequent methods used wileyonlinelibrary.com/jsfa 51,52 to detect lame cows include various types of visual interpretation of the locomotion of individual cows, i.e. visual locomotion scoring systems.…”
Section: Lameness Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%