2009
DOI: 10.1530/eje-09-0172e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for plasma-free metanephrines in the diagnosis of catecholamine-secreting tumors

Abstract: The authors and journal apologize for the error in the above paper which appeared in 161 (1) 131–140. The kits for the assay of free metanephrines were supplied by both Immunodiagnostic Systems Ltd (IDS), Tyne and Wear, UK and also Biotech-IgG (UK) Ltd, Wilmslow, UK.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, it should be noted that negative test result for PFMs provides a high probability of excluding pheochromocytoma due to its high sensitivity. In agreement with previous reports [1][2][3][4][5][6][7], our present finding confirmed high sensitivity (0.957). We would like to confirm these clinical utility in the near future.…”
Section: Sensitivity and Specificity (Diagnostic Accuracy)supporting
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Also, it should be noted that negative test result for PFMs provides a high probability of excluding pheochromocytoma due to its high sensitivity. In agreement with previous reports [1][2][3][4][5][6][7], our present finding confirmed high sensitivity (0.957). We would like to confirm these clinical utility in the near future.…”
Section: Sensitivity and Specificity (Diagnostic Accuracy)supporting
confidence: 94%
“…In addition, the current result demonstrated good sensitivity (0.957) and specificity (0.973) for the measurement of PFMs. These are similar to the values reported in the literature for both sensitivity and specificity [1][2][3][4].…”
Section: Declaration Of Interestsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations