2009
DOI: 10.3109/13561820903163827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an interprofessional collaboration workshop for post-graduate residents, nursing and allied health professionals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in attitudes and perceptions between professions have frequently been reported in the literature for RILPS, IEPS, ATHCT, SPICE, and other instruments. 11,15,16,21,24,[27][28][29][30][31] Interestingly, these differences have been observed in students, as well as post-graduate practicing professionals. In a majority of these observations, medical students and physicians had lower ratings for each respective instrument (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in attitudes and perceptions between professions have frequently been reported in the literature for RILPS, IEPS, ATHCT, SPICE, and other instruments. 11,15,16,21,24,[27][28][29][30][31] Interestingly, these differences have been observed in students, as well as post-graduate practicing professionals. In a majority of these observations, medical students and physicians had lower ratings for each respective instrument (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The workshop emphasized learning the characteristics of effective interprofessional health care teams; understanding, valuing, respecting, and integrating each practitioner's role; and, collaboratively managing a common disease and/or health issue. Curran et al (2010) reported attitudes toward health care team work improved after participation. Based on Curran et al (2010) and the current study, short-term interprofessional training for students, focused on collaboration and improved understanding of others' professional roles, can positively impact attitudes toward health care teams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…showing that face-to-face meetings are appropriate tools to build trust between participants and to facilitate engagement in subsequent one-to-one exchanges on diverse topics (Curran, Heath, Kearney, & Button, 2010;Snyder & Wenger, 2010). Even though participants made few specific changes to their ethics courses following the KE project, the project allowed them to reflect on their teaching practices and about ethics teaching across the curriculum in their institutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%