1982
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-908x.1982.tb00353.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Analytical Data: A Practical Guide for Geoanalysts

Abstract: Some of the techniques that the writer has found useful in the assessment of analytical data are described. These have been culled from statistical text books and scientific journals and it is hoped that the bringing together of this information will be helpful to other workers dealing with analytical data. The techniques include the ordering of data and elimination of outliers, the mean and median and their respective confidence intervals and a description of robust estimates of central tendency and non‐norma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In reviewing individual data sets during 1994 a consistent observation was the non-normal skewed data sets found for soil extractable nutrients independent of soil. These observations are consistent with those in the geoscience field (8).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In reviewing individual data sets during 1994 a consistent observation was the non-normal skewed data sets found for soil extractable nutrients independent of soil. These observations are consistent with those in the geoscience field (8).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Outlier or extreme values are identified using the ratio of extreme value technique developed by Dixon and Massey (2). Similar techniques have been described in the geoscience field (8). The technique is based on a ratio between a single reported value and the range of all reported values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An underlying assumption of the linear regression model is normality: In this case if the radionuclide distribution deviated significantly from normal, the nonparametric Spearman rank correlation coefficient ( r , ) was used and was tested at an a = 0.05 (Shaw and Wheeler 1985). The normality of the distribution was tested using two statistics, the onesample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, using an a = 0.15 to reduce the probability of a Type I1 error (Stephens 1974;Rao et al 1979) and the skewness factor with an a = 0.05 (Lister 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These problems are partly related to clustering of data because of selected methods and may be considerable for some determinations (Abbey, 1991), which will affect all calibration curves based on such geostandards. Useful guides for the statistical test of data for geostandards have been presented by Lister (1982;.…”
Section: Most Chemical Rock Analyses Conducted During Ocean Drillingmentioning
confidence: 99%