2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of anti-reflective cracking systems using geosynthetics in the interlayer zone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
18
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Virgili et al (2009) andFerrotti et al (2012) using the same test (4PB) also found that geogrids increased the fatigue resistance of bi-layer specimens retarding crack propagation. Furthermore, Zamora- Barraza et al (2011), apart from studying the increase on durability produced with geosynthetics, compared the behaviour of different antireflective cracking systems using a dynamic test. These authors found that all the geosynthetics delayed crack propagation, and that the geogrids with a higher modulus showed a better performance and provided higher resistance to deformations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Virgili et al (2009) andFerrotti et al (2012) using the same test (4PB) also found that geogrids increased the fatigue resistance of bi-layer specimens retarding crack propagation. Furthermore, Zamora- Barraza et al (2011), apart from studying the increase on durability produced with geosynthetics, compared the behaviour of different antireflective cracking systems using a dynamic test. These authors found that all the geosynthetics delayed crack propagation, and that the geogrids with a higher modulus showed a better performance and provided higher resistance to deformations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…geogrids, etc.) which are not only intended to reduce vibrations and stress on components, but are also used as track reinforcement in the same sense that elements like geogrid are employed in other infrastructures [47]. However, the most commonly used devices are rail pads, under-sleeper pads, and under-ballast mats, which can distribute loads and reduce the noise emissions and vibrations stemming from the movement of rails, sleepers, and ballast, whilst at the same time mitigate the impact of these elements on each other [45,48].…”
Section: Elastic Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este modelo se usa típicamente en superficies de respuesta DoE con curvatura esperada, y no incluye el término de interacción de tres formas pero añade tres términos más al modelo lineal, a saber: (26) Claramente, un modelo completo incluiría muchos términos con productos cruzados (o interacciones) implicando al cuadrado. Sin embargo, en general estos términos no son necesarios y, en este análisis DoE, estos términos se dejan fuera del modelo.…”
Section: Diseño Experimentalunclassified