2022
DOI: 10.1002/bem.22405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Atopic Dermatitis Improvement Caused by Low‐Level, Low‐Frequency Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields

Abstract: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of using low‐level, low‐frequency pulsed electromagnetic field (LLLF_PEMF) stimulation to improve atopic dermatitis induced by 2,4‐dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB). Twenty 6‐week‐old hairless mice were randomly divided into Normal (n = 5), PEMF 15 Hz (n = 5), PEMF 75 Hz (n = 5), and Sham (n = 5) groups. Following the onset of atopic dermatitis symptoms, PEMF groups (15 and 75 Hz) were stimulated with LLLF_PEMF (15 mT) for 8 h per day for 1 week. Sensory evaluation anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the previous research, skin sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin to observe the inflammation induced by leukocyte infiltration accompanied by keratinization [32]. Similar to the current findings, both the 15Hz and 75Hz PEMF groups exhibited a reduction in inflammation and lesion size comparable to the control group, while the Sham group displayed significantly greater inflammation thickness and larger lesions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the previous research, skin sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin to observe the inflammation induced by leukocyte infiltration accompanied by keratinization [32]. Similar to the current findings, both the 15Hz and 75Hz PEMF groups exhibited a reduction in inflammation and lesion size comparable to the control group, while the Sham group displayed significantly greater inflammation thickness and larger lesions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Capitalizing on these benefits, the non-perceptual nature of PEMF allows for conducting more objective and controlled experiments, minimizing stress-related variables that could skew the results. Histological analyses from prior research confirmed that PEMF stimulation had discernible anti-inflammatory and tissue regenerative effects in 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB)-induced AD models, emphasizing its therapeutic potential [32]. This evidence suggests that PEMF is not only a viable treatment modality for AD but also a catalyst for advancing our understanding of its underlying mechanisms and therapeutic pathways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Antecedent studies suggested that PEMF pulse frequency effects on cells and tissues associated with RA range from 10 to 75 Hz [ 24 ]. Therefore, the pulse frequencies used in the experiment were set at 10 Hz (145 Gauss) or 75 Hz (85.9 Gauss), and the intensity was a mono-phasic stimulation of 15 mT (pulse duty ratio: 30%) [ 25 ]. The arthritic score for the CIA control group without PEMF treatment gradually increased after day 28 and reached 9.5 ± 1.06 by day 60 ( Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…munized twice with bovine type II collagen (days 0 and 21), and PEMF trea initiated 7 days after the second immunization, as detailed in Materials and Me tecedent studies suggested that PEMF pulse frequency effects on cells and tiss ated with RA range from 10 to 75 Hz [24]. Therefore, the pulse frequencies u experiment were set at 10 Hz (145 Gauss) or 75 Hz (85.9 Gauss), and the inten mono-phasic stimulation of 15 mT (pulse duty ratio: 30%) [25]. The arthritic sc CIA control group without PEMF treatment gradually increased after day 28 a 9.5 ± 1.06 by day 60 (Figure 1).…”
Section: Pemf Ameliorates Cia In Micementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microcurrent produced under the magnetic field could stimulate living cells to reproduce and repair injured tissues. In addition, to provide pain relief (6), animal studies and clinical trials have shown the benefits of electromagnetic field therapy during the management of dermatitis, arthritis, and bone fracture (7)(8)(9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%