2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels in normal and preeclamptic women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
111
2
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
14
111
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this manner, we compared the impact of preeclampsia prediction of NT-proBNP with notch positivity together with elevated PI values. Unlike in other studies, NTproBNP levels were not different with respect to the development of preeclampsia in later pregnancy [8,13,22]. The lack of difference may be related to some reasons.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…In this manner, we compared the impact of preeclampsia prediction of NT-proBNP with notch positivity together with elevated PI values. Unlike in other studies, NTproBNP levels were not different with respect to the development of preeclampsia in later pregnancy [8,13,22]. The lack of difference may be related to some reasons.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Seven studies reported on BNP levels,78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84 of which three were applicable for a meta‐analysis ( Figure 5). 78, 79, 80 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be arranged urgently in the setting of suspected HF in the pregnant patient. Measurement of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide may be useful in confirming a diagnosis of HF when the diagnosis is not clear (77)(78)(79). Bloodwork should include complete blood The use of x-ray in pregnant women (with fetal shielding in place) should be used only if judged clinically essential.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Hf In Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 99%