2016
DOI: 10.3133/sir20165056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of background concentrations of selected chemical and radiochemical constituents in water from the eastern Snake River Plain aquifer at and near the Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho

Abstract: For more information on the USGS-the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment-visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS.For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://store.usgs.gov.Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.Although this information product, for the most part, is in the publi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The subsurface stratigraphy proposed by Anderson and his co-workers, has been largely confirmed by recent paleomagnetic stratigraphy studies others, 2011, 2013;. This report presents a more detailed comparison of the stratigraphy through the southwestern part of the site with the location of groundwater contamination that was evaluated in several recent studies others, 2015, 2017;Davis and others, 2015;Bartholomay and Hall, 2016). …”
Section: Introduction Previous Investigationssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The subsurface stratigraphy proposed by Anderson and his co-workers, has been largely confirmed by recent paleomagnetic stratigraphy studies others, 2011, 2013;. This report presents a more detailed comparison of the stratigraphy through the southwestern part of the site with the location of groundwater contamination that was evaluated in several recent studies others, 2015, 2017;Davis and others, 2015;Bartholomay and Hall, 2016). …”
Section: Introduction Previous Investigationssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The probability is about 67 percent that the true radionuclide concentration is in a range of the reported concentrations plus or minus the uncertainty. Tritium data are compared to the estimated lower level of background (75 pCi/L) determined by Orr and others (1991) even though a more recent background level as reported by Bartholomay and Hall (2016) is about 35 pCi/L for groundwater in the southwestern part of the INL. The larger background is used to account for older water that would not have gone through as many half-life decay series as water samples collected more recently, because the data used for wastewater determination were collected between 1991 and 2016 (table 3).…”
Section: Sampling and Analytical Techniques For Tritium Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Sample data collected from well TAN-2312 indicate: calcium concentrations were 34.1 mg/L, potassium concentrations were 3.67 mg/L, silica concentrations were 30.2 mg/L, chloride concentrations were 11.3 mg/L, fluoride concentrations were 0.32, and sulfate concentrations were 27.9 mg/L (table 5). Nitrate plus nitrite as N concentrations were lower than background water in the ESRP aquifer at the INL (Bartholomay and Hall, 2016). The water chemistry of this well is mostly representative of eastern regional background water for the ESRP at the INL (Bartholomay and Hall, 2016), except for the small lithium concentration (2.4 µg/L) and the small nitrate concentration (0.56 mg/L) which are more representative of western tributary water.…”
Section: Inorganic Chemistry Datamentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Nitrate plus nitrite as N concentrations were lower than background water in the ESRP aquifer at the INL (Bartholomay and Hall, 2016). The water chemistry of this well is mostly representative of eastern regional background water for the ESRP at the INL (Bartholomay and Hall, 2016), except for the small lithium concentration (2.4 µg/L) and the small nitrate concentration (0.56 mg/L) which are more representative of western tributary water. This well is near the mixing line of water types as described in Fisher and others (2012) and its chemistry supports a mixture of western tributary water and eastern regional water.…”
Section: Inorganic Chemistry Datamentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Concentrations are given in table 7. Tritium data from CPP 1, ICPP-MON-A-166, Highway-3, and USGS 127 indicate that they have concentrations greater than the upper background concentration of western tributary water of 34 pCi/L ( Bartholomay and Hall, 2016), so their water probably is slightly influenced by wastewater disposal (table 7). The other wells have either all or mostly all old water not influenced by wastewater disposal (table 7).…”
Section: Tritiummentioning
confidence: 99%