2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of BD Vacutainer® Barricor™ blood collection tubes for routine chemistry testing on a Roche Cobas® 8000 Platform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the study by Cadamuro et al (17) when compared to other tubes. The difference in LDH is not attributed to different centrifugation conditions (7,9,17). We excluded all the samples that were haemolysed based on a haemolytic index; therefore, the increase in LDH concentrations in our study was not due to artefactual increase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast, the study by Cadamuro et al (17) when compared to other tubes. The difference in LDH is not attributed to different centrifugation conditions (7,9,17). We excluded all the samples that were haemolysed based on a haemolytic index; therefore, the increase in LDH concentrations in our study was not due to artefactual increase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Barricor tube has been compared with other tubes [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. A comparison with PST for 50 analytes in 150 patients revealed that the results for the two tubes were comparable, with increased stability for some analytes in the Barricor tube [12]. In 41 volunteers, the Barricor tube yielded decreased LDH and free hemoglobin levels compared with that in the PST [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical blood separation methods are similarly gaining popularity in clinical chemistry due to their easy applicability compared to the use of a separation gel. The BD Vacutainer® Barricor™ is a mechanically-separated plasma (MSP) tube, and it has shown no obvious bias in steroid hormone measurements versus a gel-based plasma tube in a single study 33 , but this was confined to a select number of five steroids, warranting further investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%