2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of biotope's importance for biotic resource protection by the Bonner Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, such a framework has been rarely applied when studying the restoration of degraded ecosystems (Ren et al, 2008 ; Singh et al, 2012 ). We might, therefore, better understand the effects of nurse plants on the restoration of ecosystems by considering the features of beneficiary species beneath nurse plants with different life forms, their relationships at different ages of abandonment since the cessation of mining and at different spatial scales (Gastauer et al, 2013 ; Perring et al, 2015 ). The availability of restored sites at different ages of abandonment and different spatial scales will enable a field observation of chronosequence changes in vegetation regarding effects of plant–plant interactions for land restoration (Cadotte, 2013 ; Clark et al, 2012 ; Navarro‐Cano et al, 2014 ; Prach & Tolvanen., 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such a framework has been rarely applied when studying the restoration of degraded ecosystems (Ren et al, 2008 ; Singh et al, 2012 ). We might, therefore, better understand the effects of nurse plants on the restoration of ecosystems by considering the features of beneficiary species beneath nurse plants with different life forms, their relationships at different ages of abandonment since the cessation of mining and at different spatial scales (Gastauer et al, 2013 ; Perring et al, 2015 ). The availability of restored sites at different ages of abandonment and different spatial scales will enable a field observation of chronosequence changes in vegetation regarding effects of plant–plant interactions for land restoration (Cadotte, 2013 ; Clark et al, 2012 ; Navarro‐Cano et al, 2014 ; Prach & Tolvanen., 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the analysis of multiple environmental variables during the monitoring procedure may produce detailed feedback in practice (Lechner et al, 2018), different variables may yield different estimates of rehabilitation progress (Ruiz-Jaen & Aide, 2005), making interpretations difficult and wordy. Thus, the integration of multiple indicators into a unique index of rehabilitation status may facilitate the evaluation of monitored areas (Gastauer, Trein, Meira-Neto, & Schumacher, 2013). Such integration is not an easy task, requiring multivariate approaches able to deal with collinearity among variables (Rosenfield & Müller, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…et al 2016). This valuation approach has formed the basis of many studies that have applied scoring techniques (Usher 1994;Gastauer et al 2013;Capmourteres and Anand 2016;IUCN 2016), and we used it to develop our framework of reasonable and operational measures to assess the nature conservation value of forest conservation objects.…”
Section: Special Case: Legally Protected Habitat Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%