2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of bubble flow properties between flat sheet membranes in membrane bioreactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Yamanoi and Kageyama also reported that the large bubbles (11–21 mm) with two‐dimensional amorphous shapes between membranes resulted in a larger shear stress compared to the bubbles (3.7–10 mm) smaller than the membrane clearance in an FSMBR. Culfaz et al found that large, cap‐shaped bubbles and slugs performed better than small bubbles in Hollow Fiber MBRs .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, Yamanoi and Kageyama also reported that the large bubbles (11–21 mm) with two‐dimensional amorphous shapes between membranes resulted in a larger shear stress compared to the bubbles (3.7–10 mm) smaller than the membrane clearance in an FSMBR. Culfaz et al found that large, cap‐shaped bubbles and slugs performed better than small bubbles in Hollow Fiber MBRs .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, large amount of fundamental research has focused on tubular and hollow fiber membrane modules . Although growing, the literature on two‐phase flow and energy usage for the FS format is still, in general, quite limited . Furthermore, the method to produce slug bubbles for a commercial large‐scale FSMBR (i.e., 100 membrane sheets) was still needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that slug bubbles had desirable hydrodynamic characteristics in fouling control and enhancing permeate flux and selectivity for different membrane modules in various membrane filtration processes (Zhang et al, 2011, Cui et al, 2003, Yamanoi and Kageyama, 2010, Mercier et al, 1997. The interactions between bubbles and membrane surface are the major shear stress mechanism working on hollow fiber membrane, especially for the vertically- shear stress and fouling for the submerged UF hollow fiber membrane.…”
Section: Air Spargingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental studies on this topic have been scarcely reported, which could probably arise from either the difficulty in measuring the hydrodynamics (concerning intrusive impacts on the test flow (Yamanoi and Kageyama, 2010) and interference from sludge flocs (Bérubé et al, 2006;Chan et al, 2011)), or the onerous effort required to create a series of representative scenarios for the experiments (involving reactor building and baffle resizing). In this context, mathematical modeling studies have been conducted more often, with several simplified empirical models proposed to predict some collective properties of hydrodynamics (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%