2001
DOI: 10.1109/7.913684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of built-in test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hardware fault in the navigation system can be checked via a built-in test (BIT) function at the start of operation (Pecht et al 2001). Integration with anomalous GPS data caused by jamming, shading and dynamic maneuvering can lead to a significant degradation in the navigation performance (Grewal et al 2001).…”
Section: Adgps/ins Integrated Navigation System With Fdimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hardware fault in the navigation system can be checked via a built-in test (BIT) function at the start of operation (Pecht et al 2001). Integration with anomalous GPS data caused by jamming, shading and dynamic maneuvering can lead to a significant degradation in the navigation performance (Grewal et al 2001).…”
Section: Adgps/ins Integrated Navigation System With Fdimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, these new technologies and methods must account for soft faults 1 0026-2714/$ -see front matter Published by Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.microrel.2010.01.006 and intermittent 2 failures, which are some of the most common failure modes in today's information systems [18]. The most promising discipline of technologies and methods with the potential of solving reliability, availability, and maintainability problems is called prognostics and systems health management (PHM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By locating several prognostic monitors with different known accelerating factors on a circuit, the failure times of each of these cells can be trended to predict failure in the actual circuit at any time after at least two prognostic monitors have failed. While this method is convenient and uncomplicated, Pecht et al (2001) argue that BIST monitors are not always sufficient for detecting and identifying failures. The authors found BIST results to suffer from a high false alarm rate and a low correlation between the fault indicated by the BIST and the actual fault.…”
Section: Electronic Prognosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%