Evaluation of calcium silicate cement bond strength after using gutta-percha solvents

Bayram, Emre; Bayram, H. Melike; Aslan, Tuğrul; Göktürk, Hakan; Üstün, Yakup

doi:10.4103/1119-3077.197020

Cited by 3 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Most studies demonstrated statistically significant differences in dislodgment resistance after the use of a chelating solution in comparison to control groups, except for one (34). Three studies (33,35,40) showed no differences among the chelating groups tested. In one of the studies (35), the chitosan presented higher values of dislodgment resistance than 17% EDTA and Smear Clear ® and demonstrated that QMix and 17% EDTA had similar effects on the bond strength of all the sealers tested.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…Three studies (33,35,40) showed no differences among the chelating groups tested. In one of the studies (35), the chitosan presented higher values of dislodgment resistance than 17% EDTA and Smear Clear ® and demonstrated that QMix and 17% EDTA had similar effects on the bond strength of all the sealers tested. Güzel et al .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…Except for two studies that used distilled water (30,38), all the others used NaOCl during instrumentation. The concentrations of NaOCl ranged from 1% (28,29,39) to 5.25% (34–36). The time of action of the irrigant ranged from 1 (40) to 6 min (36), and the volume from 1 ml (28) to 5 ml (29,40) at each instrument change.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Aslan & Şener (36) used a flowing rate of 6 ml min −1 in the 4 min groups and 4 ml min −1 in the 6 min groups. One study did not indicate the total volume of irrigant used (35), and three studies did not mention the time of action (33,34,37).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Gutta‐percha has the weakest bond in the filling set and this lower adhesion reduces the mechanical properties of root canal filling materials compared to the use of endodontic sealer alone, demonstrating a low resistance to elastic deformation (58). In this systematic review, two studies (35,40) did not clearly mention if the unit analysed was the tooth or the slices obtained. However, the authors must inform whether the sample size calculation was based on the number of teeth or slices as the push‐out test is performed from slices of dental roots.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Influence of the use of chelating agents as final irrigant on the push‐out bond strength of epoxy resin‐based root canal sealers: A systematic review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This systematic review (PROSPERO -CRD42020150722) was performed to answer the following question: Does the use of chelating agents affect the dislodgment resistance of epoxy resin-based root canal sealers? A search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, LILACS and Web of Science, hand searching of two endodontic journals and grey literature until September 2020. Extracted data included: teeth used, sample size, root canal preparation, irrigant, chelating solution, neutralisation solution, type of resin-based sealer and obturation approach, storage method and duration, root third and slice thickness, plunger dimension and loading direction and the push-out testing parameters and values. The search retrieved a total of 2.389 studies. After analysis, 12 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included. Most of the final irrigation protocols with chelating agents had a positive impact and promoted an improvement in the dislodgment resistance of epoxy resin-based sealers to the root dentin.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Influence of the use of chelating agents as final irrigant on the push‐out bond strength of epoxy resin‐based root canal sealers: A systematic review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Design Variability of the Push-out Bond Test in Endodontic Research: A Systematic Review

Brichko

Burrow

Parashos

2018

Journal of Endodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Eficacia disolvente y citotoxicidad del aceite de cáscara de limón (Citrus limon)

Herrera-Plasencia¹,

García-Rupaya²,

Delgado-Cotrina³

2019

Rev Estomatol Herediana.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objetivo: Evaluar in vitro el efecto disolvente y tóxico del aceite de cáscara de limón (Citrus limon) según tiempo de exposición e identificar sus componentes a través de la cromatografía de gases. Material y métodos: El estudio fue de tipo experimental in vitro. Para determinar el efecto disolvente se utilizaron conos de gutapercha estandarizados de endodoncia número 80 con conicidad 0,02; los disolventes utilizados fueron: xilol, aceite esencial de cáscara de limón y naranja; éstos fueron sumergidos en 2, 5 y 10 minutos (n=8). Se registró el peso antes y después de la inmersión a las sustancias evaluadas para determinar la pérdida de masa. Para evaluar la toxicidad se emplearon Artemias franciscanas a través de la concentración letal media; la cromatografía de gases se utilizó para obtener los componentes de cada aceite. Para comparar el efecto disolvente entre las sustancias se empleó el análisis ANOVA/Tukey. Resultados: No se encontró diferencia significativa para disolver la gutapercha con el aceite esencial de cáscara de limón, de naranja y xilol (p>0.05). El tiempo no tuvo influencia para la disolución de la gutapercha (p>0.05). Todos los aceites fueron tóxicos, a excepción del aceite de limón 25%. Conclusiones: El Limoneno y el D limoneno fueron los componentes con mayor porcentaje en el aceite de limón y de naranja, respectivamente. El aceite de limón podría ser una considerada como alternativa para ser utilizado como disolvente de gutapercha de uso endodóntico, por tener efecto similar que el aceite naranja.

show abstract

Evaluation of calcium silicate cement bond strength after using gutta-percha solvents

Abstract: Gutta-percha solvents used during retreatment decreased the bond strength of Biodentine and CMTA to root dentin. The bond strength of WMTA was not affected by the use of gutta-percha solvents.

Cited by 3 publications

References 3 publications

Influence of the use of chelating agents as final irrigant on the push‐out bond strength of epoxy resin‐based root canal sealers: A systematic review

Influence of the use of chelating agents as final irrigant on the push‐out bond strength of epoxy resin‐based root canal sealers: A systematic review

Design Variability of the Push-out Bond Test in Endodontic Research: A Systematic Review

Eficacia disolvente y citotoxicidad del aceite de cáscara de limón (Citrus limon)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About