“…Patients with mild, moderate and severe cardiac iron overload (T2* 12-20, 8-12 and less than 8 ms, respectively) had impaired LVEF in [56] (r 2 = 0.003, P = 0.04) TM/776 patients Retrospective Significant relationship between cardiac R2* and ferritin / Marsella et al [59] (r = -0.359, P < 0.0001) TM/167 patients Prospective Myocardial T2* was correlated with serum ferritin / Tanner et al [60] (r = -0.34, P < 0.001) TM/19 patients, SCD/17 patients Cross sectional Cardiac 1/T2* was correlated with ferritin level / Wood et al [61] (r 2 = 0.33, P = 0.01) TM/106 patients Prospective No significant correlation between heart T2* and serum ferritin × Anderson et al [16] TM/60 patients Prospective Serum ferritin did not correlate with cardiac iron values × Merchant et al [57] TM/20 patients Prospective No correlation between serum ferritin and cardiac T2* × Kolnagou et al [58] TM/47 patients Retrospective Cardiac T2* was not associated with the serum ferritin × Bayraktaroğlu et al [22] TM: Thalassemia major; SCD: Sickle cell disease. TM/776 patients Retrospective Significant correlation between LVEF and cardiac R2* (r = -0.327, P < 0.0001) / Marsella et al [59] TM/106 patients Prospective Significant correlation of myocardial T2* below 20 ms with LVEF (r = 0.61, P < 0.0001), LVESVi (r = 0.50, P < 0.0001), and LV mass index (r = 0.40, P < 0.001) / Anderson et al [16] TM/167 patients Prospective Significant relationship between myocardial iron and LVEF (r = 0.57, P < 0.001) / Tanner et al [60] TM/67 patients Cross sectional Myocardial T2* related to LV diastolic function (EPFR, r = -0.20, P = 0.19; APFR, r = 0.49, P < 0.001; EPFR/APFR ratio, r = -0.62, P < 0.001) / Westwood et al [52] TM/33 patients Cross sectional Good correlation of DT, Tei index and E/Em index with cardiac T2* values (P < 0.05, r = 0.70-0.81) and weak correlation of E/A with T2* (P < 0.05, r = -0.44) / Barzin et al [84] TM/47 patients Retrospective Significant correlations of the myocardial T2* with LVESVi and LVEDVi (r = -0.32, P = 0.027; r = -0.29, P = 0.046, respectively) / Bayraktaroğlu et al [22] TM/19 patients, SCD/17 patients…”