Evaluation of Central Venous Access with Accelerated Seldinger Technique Versus Modified Seldinger Technique

Thaut, Lane; Weymouth, Wells; Hunsaker, Branden; Reschke, Daniel

doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.10.021

Cited by 13 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, Powerwand catheters are inserted using the Accelerated Seldinger Technique while other types of midline catheters use the Modified Seldinger Technique, which has been shown to require a significantly longer insertion time compared to the former in studies on PICCs and central venous catheters. 21,22 Finally, we only use Sorbaview Shield dressing with integrated securement system. Thus, our findings may not be representative of other methods of midline securement.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Midline catheters: A 3-year experience at a veterans administration medical center

Johnson

Gupta

Feierabend

et al. 2023

American Journal of Infection Control

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Midline catheters: A 3-year experience at a veterans administration medical center

Johnson

Gupta

Feierabend

et al. 2023

American Journal of Infection Control

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The modified Seldinger technique was used for catheterization as described (Thaut et al, 2019). Aseptic and maximal sterile barrier techniques were strictly adhered to (Gorski et al, 2021).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of terminal tip location of midline catheters on catheter‐related complications and indwelling duration in elderly patients

Zhao

Tian

et al. 2022

Nursing Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Peripheral venous catheters (PVCs) are a common and essential device used worldwide for the infusion of intravenous (IV) fluid, parenteral nutrition support and other important clinical interventions (McCallum & Higgins, 2012). PVCs are classified into three major categories: peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs), long peripheral catheters (LPCs) and midline catheters (MCs;Gorski et al., 2021).PIVCs are easy to insert, but the average detaining time for adults is only 44 hr. Thus, they are only suitable for short-term infusion in patients (Hadaway, 2012;Kollar, 2021). LPCs have been recently introduced into clinical practice and provide an alternative means of peripheral venous access in acute inpatients with difficult venous access (Qin et al., 2021). However, as LPCs are not yet broadly used, the risk of complications remains to be evaluated in large controlled studies (Badger, 2019).Midline catheters are typically 20-30 cm in length and are inserted into the peripheral veins of the upper arm with placement terminating

show abstract

“…The Seldinger technique was used to puncture the femoral artery percutaneously, followed by the insertion of a 5F catheter sheath, as described in the previous study ( 15 ). Subsequently, a 5F Pig catheter, RH catheter, Yashiro catheter and Simon 1 catheter (Terumo or Cordis Co.) were inserted.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of interventional embolization in the treatment of iatrogenic pseudoaneurysms

Cong

Zhou

et al. 2020

Exp Ther Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study aimed to investigate the clinical effectiveness and safety of endovascular embolization for the treatment of pseudoaneurysm secondary to previous abdominal and pelvic surgery or radiological percutaneous abdominal procedure. A retrospective review was performed on all patients with abdominal and pelvic pseudoaneurysm confirmed by CT angiography or digital subtraction angiography and treated with endovascular embolization. Different techniques of embolization with coils were applied and the outcomes, including clinical effectiveness and safety, were assessed. A total of 31 patients with a total of 32 pseudoaneurysms were included in the present study. Of these pseudoaneurysms, 23 were from the main trunks and branches of the gastroduodenal artery, 5 were from the splenic artery, 2 were from the common hepatic artery, 1 was from the right hepatic artery and 1 was from the right internal iliac artery. There were no serious complications observed and there was no occurrence of re-bleeding following embolization. The embolization of the pseudoaneurysms was successful in all patients. In conclusion, endovascular embolization is a safe and effective method for the treatment of secondary iatrogenic pseudoaneurysm in the abdomen and pelvis.

show abstract

Evaluation of Central Venous Access with Accelerated Seldinger Technique Versus Modified Seldinger Technique

Cited by 13 publications

References 5 publications

Midline catheters: A 3-year experience at a veterans administration medical center

Midline catheters: A 3-year experience at a veterans administration medical center

Impact of terminal tip location of midline catheters on catheter‐related complications and indwelling duration in elderly patients

Application of interventional embolization in the treatment of iatrogenic pseudoaneurysms

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About