2003
DOI: 10.1045/february2003-white
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Chat Reference Service Quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evaluations of efficiency and effectiveness in task dimensions such as correctly answering the questions posed are appearing in the literature in increasing numbers (e.g., see Carter & Janes, 2002;Foley, 2002;Gross & McClure, 2001;Kaske & Arnold, 2002;White, Abels, & Kaske, 2003). However, few research studies have appeared on relational dimensions of virtual reference.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Evaluations of efficiency and effectiveness in task dimensions such as correctly answering the questions posed are appearing in the literature in increasing numbers (e.g., see Carter & Janes, 2002;Foley, 2002;Gross & McClure, 2001;Kaske & Arnold, 2002;White, Abels, & Kaske, 2003). However, few research studies have appeared on relational dimensions of virtual reference.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In a pilot study conducted by the University of Maryland, the researchers found that librarians answered questions with a high level of accuracy but when it came to escalating a question to proceed deeper into the research process with the questioner, on the whole, librarians were less than adequate in this regard. The finding suggests that the interactive aspects of chat reference need to be further developed [40].…”
Section: Electronic Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Questions specific to the researcher's institution, such as hours of service, specific holdings, or availability of services were eliminated. None of the questions was deemed by the expert panel to be difficult to understand, but the questions were of increasing difficulty (White, Abels, & Kaske, 2003). Each of the questions selected was researched, and basic sources that held the correct answers were identified.…”
Section: Unobtrusive Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%