2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of CLM5.0 for simulating surface energy budget and soil hydrothermal regime in permafrost regions of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observations of talik onset are sparse, but the existence of talik generally correlates with soil temperature. Near‐surface permafrost soil temperature in CLM5 agrees well with observations, and captures both trends and the seasonal cycle (Yang et al., 2022), though deeper temperatures can have a warm bias compared to observations, especially during the thawing season (Ma et al., 2023; Yang et al., 2022). The relationship between mean annual air temperature and mean annual ground temperature is also well‐represented in CLM5 compared to observations (Burke et al., 2020), and this relationship is important for accurately simulating permafrost and permafrost thaw.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Observations of talik onset are sparse, but the existence of talik generally correlates with soil temperature. Near‐surface permafrost soil temperature in CLM5 agrees well with observations, and captures both trends and the seasonal cycle (Yang et al., 2022), though deeper temperatures can have a warm bias compared to observations, especially during the thawing season (Ma et al., 2023; Yang et al., 2022). The relationship between mean annual air temperature and mean annual ground temperature is also well‐represented in CLM5 compared to observations (Burke et al., 2020), and this relationship is important for accurately simulating permafrost and permafrost thaw.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Although the CLM5 has been updated and developed several times and is widely used, there are still some uncertainties in some parameterization schemes related to soil hydrological and thermal processes in the simulation. For example, Ma et al [55] evaluated the simulation performance of the CLM5 on the TP using soil temperature and moisture as well as energy flux observations, and they found that the default roughness scheme and dry surface layer scheme in the CLM5 produce a large error in the simulation of surface energy flux and soil temperature. Several other studies of thermal conductivity evaluations have shown that the CLM5 default thermal conductivity scheme provides inaccurate predictions and significantly overestimates thermal conductivity for some local soil samples [56,57].…”
Section: Uncertainty In Permafrost Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%