2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4804717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of cloud heterogeneity effects on total and polarized visible radiances as measured by POLDER/PARASOL and consequences for retrieved cloud properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For practical and computational cost purposes, interpretation of such measurements generally also assumes 1-D radiative algorithm and PPH cloud. This assumption can be far from being realistic and leads to biases on the retrieved properties from passive sensors (Barker and Liu, 1995; Marshak, 2002Marshak, , 2007Lafont and Guillemet, 2004;Cornet et al, 2005Cornet et al, , 2013 and active sensors (Battaglia and Tanelli, 2011). These biases depend at least, on the cloud coverage and on the variability of cloud optical depth or water content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For practical and computational cost purposes, interpretation of such measurements generally also assumes 1-D radiative algorithm and PPH cloud. This assumption can be far from being realistic and leads to biases on the retrieved properties from passive sensors (Barker and Liu, 1995; Marshak, 2002Marshak, , 2007Lafont and Guillemet, 2004;Cornet et al, 2005Cornet et al, , 2013 and active sensors (Battaglia and Tanelli, 2011). These biases depend at least, on the cloud coverage and on the variability of cloud optical depth or water content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the computational time, accurate 3-D cloudy radiative transfer problem is not an issue, per se (Evans and Wiscombe, 2004). Monte Carlo transfer models can indeed accurately and efficiently compute radiative properties for arbitrary cloud fields (Battaglia and Mantovani, 2005;Pincus and Evans, 2009;Mayer, 2009;Cornet et al, 2010Cornet et al, , 2013Battaglia and Tanelli, 2011;Fauchez et al, 2013). The difficulty is to generate cloud property fields that are statistically representative of cloud fields in nature.…”
Section: F Szczap Et Al: a Flexible Three-dimensional Cloud Generatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our method assumes that clouds are horizontally and vertically homogeneous owing to the use of plane-parallel radiative transfer algorithm (i.e., 1-D code). However, numerous studies have shown that the horizontal heterogeneity of clouds affects the scattered radiation measurements through three-dimensional radiative transfer effects (e.g., Marshak and Davis, 2005;Cornet et al, 2013;Zhang et al, 2012). The cloud heterogeneity may thus affect our estimation of aerosol and cloud properties as well as the DRE.…”
Section: Cloud Heterogeneity Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale invariant properties observed in real clouds can be controlled. The power spectra of the logarithm of their optical properties (optical depth, liquid water content or liquid water path for low clouds and ice water content for high clouds) typically exhibits a spectral slope of around −5/3 (Davis et al, 1994(Davis et al, , 1996(Davis et al, , 1997(Davis et al, , 1999Cahalan et al, 1994;Benassi et al, 2004;Hogan and Kew, 2005;Hill et al, 2012;Fauchez et al, 2014) from small scale (a few metres) to the "integral scale" or the outer scale (few tenths of a kilometre to one-hundred kilometres), where the spectrum becomes flat (i.e. decorrelation occurs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%