2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11803-011-0073-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of collapse resistance of RC frame structures for Chinese schools in seismic design categories B and C

Abstract: According to the Code for Seismic Design of Buildings (GB50011-2001), ten typical reinforced concrete (RC) frame structures, used as school classroom buildings, are designed with different seismic fortifi cation intensities (SFIs) (SFI=6 to 8.5) and different seismic design categories (SDCs) (SDC=B and C). The collapse resistance of the frames with SDC=B and C in terms of collapse fragility curves are quantitatively evaluated and compared via incremental dynamic analysis (IDA). The results show that the collap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CMR is defined as the ratio of the actual collapse resistance of the structure to the earthquake intensity of the specified collapse-prevention level (maximum considered earthquake). Thus, CMR is conceptually similar to a safety factor (Tang et al 2011). If we take the actual average collapse resistance of the structure, represented by the ground motion intensity under which there is a 50% chance of collapse, as Sa(T1)50%collapse, and the ground motion intensity of the maximum considered earthquake as Sa(T1)MCE, the CMR corresponding to the maximum considered earthquake is calculated as:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CMR is defined as the ratio of the actual collapse resistance of the structure to the earthquake intensity of the specified collapse-prevention level (maximum considered earthquake). Thus, CMR is conceptually similar to a safety factor (Tang et al 2011). If we take the actual average collapse resistance of the structure, represented by the ground motion intensity under which there is a 50% chance of collapse, as Sa(T1)50%collapse, and the ground motion intensity of the maximum considered earthquake as Sa(T1)MCE, the CMR corresponding to the maximum considered earthquake is calculated as:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of collapse fragility curves to assess the collapse safety of structures has recently become a common practice (e.g., Zareian, 2006;Tang et al, 2011;Eads et al, 2013). The collapse fragility curve obtained by using a scalar IM shows how the probability of collapse of a structure increases with increasing IM level.…”
Section: Collapse Fragility Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the IDAbased collapse fragility evaluation approach has been used worldwide to assess the seismic collapse capacity of structural systems in order to improve the collapse safety design (Luco et al 2007;FEMA 2009;Haselton et al 2010;Liel et al 2010;Tang et al 2011;Lu et al 2012). Nevertheless, a rigorous IDA-based collapse fragility evaluation approach is computationally demanding that has prompted many researchers seeking simplified, approximate and practical methods to assess the collapse resistance of structures (Han et al 2010;Shafei et al 2011;Fajfar and Dolšek 2011).…”
Section: Development Of Seismic Collapse Capacity Spectra and Parametmentioning
confidence: 99%