Evaluation of combinations of procedures in cesarean section

Stark, Michael; Chavkin, Y.; Kupfersztain, C.; Guedj, P; Finkel, Aliza R.

doi:10.1016/0020-7292(94)02306-j

Cited by 120 publications

(90 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The cesarean delivery rate in our hospital was 21.32%. 5 . Every pregnancy whether teen or otherwise has to be considered important as maternal complications cannot be predicted.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The rate of cesarean delivery was 6 times higher in referred cases as compared to booked cases, the reason being lack of proper antenatal and intranatal care. 5 There was significant difference in the incidence of low birth weight babies in booked and unbooked cases thus utilization of the antenatal services provides a health care package to the women and her baby. The commonest indication for elective cesarean section was previous cesarean section (42%) followed by previous 2LSCS (15%), primi breech (15%), and CPD (14%).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A clinical study of rate and indications of cesarean section, maternal and fetal outcomes at tertiary care center in north western Rajasthan

Verma

Saini²,

Sehra

et al. 2016

Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The cesarean delivery rate in our hospital was 21.32%. 5 . Every pregnancy whether teen or otherwise has to be considered important as maternal complications cannot be predicted.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A clinical study of rate and indications of cesarean section, maternal and fetal outcomes at tertiary care center in north western Rajasthan

Verma

Saini²,

Sehra

et al. 2016

Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In the present series the maximum number of patients who underwent caesarean sections was primigravidae (46.5%) followed by second gravid (38.5%), similar results were obtained by Dilip KCet al and Kshirsagar N et al, but in study of M Stark et al the mean age was 28.9 years in Joel Cohen's group and 29.4 years in pfannensteil's group. [1][2][3] this difference can be explained by the early age of marriage, low education level leads to early conception.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical study of Misgav Ladach technique of caesarean section

Gadappa

Dixit

Sharma

et al. 2017

Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

INTRODUCTIONCaesarean section is the commonest major surgical procedure in modern days and situations often demand its performance in the quickest possible operative time for fetal or maternal emergencies without compromising the surgical excellence. In today's world there is a continuous search for better and more satisfactory techniques for caesarean section. This is one of the changing trend in caesarean section, thus an attempt was made to evaluate this technique of LSCS in detail regards to technique and patient's benefit. METHODSIt was prospective surgical interventional study carried out on 200 patients who underwent caesarean section at Government medical college Aurangabad after taking permission from institutional ethical committee.200 cases were randomly selected whose complete blood count, blood grouping was known preoperatively. After taking a through history and complete general and ABSTRACT Background: In the last decades caesarean section rates increased in many countries becoming the most performed intraperitoneal surgical procedure. The operative technique performed is made chiefly on the basis of the individual experience and preference of operators, the characteristics of patients, timing and urgency of intervention. Present study was undertaken to assess the benefits of the Misgav Ladach caesarean section technique in tertiary care hospital and evaluate the operative parameters like efficacy, safety, duration of surgery, blood loss, need for suture material, post-operative morbidity. Methods: Prospective surgical interventional study conducted in department of obstetrics and gynecology in tertiary care institute. Results: The duration of surgery, blood loss and post-operative complications were significantly less in the Misgav Ladach technique of LSCS. Conclusions:The choice of the Caesarean section technique is strictly linked to the individual experience and confidence of the surgical team. Misgav-Ladach technique proved to be associated to less complications, moreover, since its shorter operating time; it is to prefer in all that cases a prompt operation is required.

show abstract

“…The myometrium was incised transversely in the midline but not to breach the amniotic sac. The myometrium was opened and the opening extended laterally by finger dissection [3,7].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Visual Analog Pain Scores of Two Different Abdominal Incisions for Cesarean Section: Prospective Randomized Trial

Soysal¹,

Uğur²,

Var³

2013

MMJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: This study compared the Joel-Cohen and Pfannenstiel incisions for cesarean sections by using visual analog scale (VAS) scores and perioperative findings.Patients and Methods: One hundred pregnant patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group had Joel-Cohen incisions and the other group had the standard Pfannenstiel incision, both by the same surgeon. Intraoperative and postperative findings including the VAS scores of the patients were recorded.Results: The median total operation time for the Joel-Cohen group was 1500 (1140-3600) seconds and was 1740 (1140-3600) seconds for the Pfannenstiel group. The mean extraction time of the fetus was shorter for the Joel-Cohen group (146.9±74.4 seconds) when compared to Pfannenstiel group (193.9±56.5 seconds). Postoperative pain assessment by VAS was similar for both groups.Conclusion: When urgent extraction of the fetus is needed the Joel-Cohen incision should be chosen for cesarean sections. In other cases, the Joel-Cohen incision technique has no advantage over the standard Pfannenstiel incision so far as postoperative pain is concerned

show abstract

Evaluation of combinations of procedures in cesarean section

Abstract: The cesarean section procedure we have devised is not only safe, but has a lower risk of long- and short-term complications.

Cited by 120 publications

References 7 publications

A clinical study of rate and indications of cesarean section, maternal and fetal outcomes at tertiary care center in north western Rajasthan

A clinical study of rate and indications of cesarean section, maternal and fetal outcomes at tertiary care center in north western Rajasthan

Clinical study of Misgav Ladach technique of caesarean section

Comparison of Visual Analog Pain Scores of Two Different Abdominal Incisions for Cesarean Section: Prospective Randomized Trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About