1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00339692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of computer advisor in the interpretation of CT images of the head

Abstract: This paper describes the evaluation of a computer advisor system (BRAINS), which was constructed to aid in the interpretation of CT images of the head. It was developed at the National Hospital for Nervous Diseases, Queen Square, London. The system was transferred, without difficulty, to an 'external', that is previously unassociated, site (the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Manchester) for an external evaluation. Response of external users to the system was mixed. Many were unfamiliar with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a distribution of the tumour types derived from the Iiterature it is 85%, for our sample 82% were calcu lated. Despite the small number of patients this result is comparable to that of other authors [2,3], although a prac tically applicable system would have to cope with more than only 7 alternative diagnoses [3].…”
Section: Results and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…For a distribution of the tumour types derived from the Iiterature it is 85%, for our sample 82% were calcu lated. Despite the small number of patients this result is comparable to that of other authors [2,3], although a prac tically applicable system would have to cope with more than only 7 alternative diagnoses [3].…”
Section: Results and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This finding was partly related to the fact that variations in the language used for radiological descriptors meant that users had difficulty entering image description data in a reliable, consistent and repeatable manner [20].…”
Section: Rule-based Expert Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BRAINS and MRI advisor [18][19][20][21] highlighted two important concepts. Firstly, DSS perform better with standardised descriptor inputs.…”
Section: Summary: Rule-based Expert Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study in the area of CT brain scans led to the development of a structured description process for CT images and a menu-based computer advisor (BRAINS) to aid in image interpretation and cerebral disease diagnosis 2 • 14 • Diagnostic advice is based on a statistical comparison of the feature values of the image with the image descriptions of cases of known pathology entered by an experienced radiologist. An independent evaluation 15 identified the training benefits of a structured approach to reporting linked to a reference set of annotated example images and diagrams.…”
Section: Structured Description and Statistical Modelling For Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%