2016
DOI: 10.4305/metu.jfa.2016.2.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation Of Construct Elicitation As A Research Method To Obtain Design-Relevant Data From Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the initial part of the RGT application, it is essential to present the elements that will be part of the grid if the participants do not know them. As reported by Süner and Erbuğ (2016), the mere presentation of images may be in sufficient for a good understanding of the participants. As a consequence, when the grid is filled, it may not have con sistent information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the initial part of the RGT application, it is essential to present the elements that will be part of the grid if the participants do not know them. As reported by Süner and Erbuğ (2016), the mere presentation of images may be in sufficient for a good understanding of the participants. As a consequence, when the grid is filled, it may not have con sistent information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, it was easier when they were al lowed to use pen and paper to describe their requirements in a tabular format. Süner and Erbuğ (2016) found difficulty in building con structors. Most of the construct poles were simply proposed by adding "not" in front of the original construct or describ ing the two poles as "easy to ... / difficult to ...".…”
Section: What Are the Difficulties Related To The Use Of Rgt As A Tool For Requirements Elicita Tion?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the participants were encouraged to explain their constructs to obtain a clear and deeper understanding. It is a strong tool for eliciting in-depth, value-laden "superordinate" constructs (e.g., Süner and Erbuğ 2016). Also, they were asked to rate the designs according to the constructs using a seven-point scale.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Kuru (2016) claimed, the applicability of RG in qualitative and quantitative data collection makes it utilisable at different stages of a design process. When requirement elicitation is the first and most crucial activity at an early design stage, RG can be adopted to understand initial user needs and requirements through comparison of design ideas (e.g., Kuru 2016, Süner & Erbuğ, 2016. At the evaluation stage, it can be applied to analyse the specific criteria people use to evaluate a design (e.g.…”
Section: Measuring Cultural Differences In Design and Design Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%