2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10147-020-01734-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of COVID 19 infection in 279 cancer patients treated during a 90-day period in 2020 pandemic

Abstract: Background The aim of this study was investigation of COVID-19 disease and its outcome in cancer patients who needed treatment, in a 90-day period. Methods Cancer patient who required treatment, were evaluated for potential COVID-19 infection in a 90-day period, starting from beginning of this epidemic in Iran, January, to April 19, 2020. For treatment of solid tumor patients, if they did not have symptoms related to COVID-19, just chest X-ray was requested. If they showed COVID-19 related symptoms, high resol… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data show a higher infection rate when compared with other reported studies: Fong D et al [ 13 ] reported a prevalence of 1.8% in a tertiary care hospital in northern Italy; Marschner S et al [ 14 ] reported an infection rate of 0.72% in Munich (Germany); Berghoff AS et al [ 15 ] reported a low rate of detectable SARS-CoV-2 (0.4%) in a large cohort of 1,016 consecutive cancer patients in Vienna (Austria); Yu J et al [ 16 ] reported 12 consecutive cases of COVID-19 pneumonia in 1,524 patients with cancer (0.79%) in Wuhan (China); Aznab M [ 17 ] reported three cases of COVID-19 in 279 patients (1.08%) with solid tumors and hematologic malignances in Kermanshah (Iran); Moss C et al [ 18 ] reported nine positive cases amongh 654 cancer patients (1.38%) that were swabbed for COVID-19 in London. More recently, Aschele C et al [ 19 ], in a large multi-institutional retrospective study in Italy, reported the incidence of COVID-19 among 59,989 patients undergoing active antitumor treatment, between January 15, 2020 and May 4, 2020: 406 (0.68%) developed COVID-19 and 77% required hospitalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data show a higher infection rate when compared with other reported studies: Fong D et al [ 13 ] reported a prevalence of 1.8% in a tertiary care hospital in northern Italy; Marschner S et al [ 14 ] reported an infection rate of 0.72% in Munich (Germany); Berghoff AS et al [ 15 ] reported a low rate of detectable SARS-CoV-2 (0.4%) in a large cohort of 1,016 consecutive cancer patients in Vienna (Austria); Yu J et al [ 16 ] reported 12 consecutive cases of COVID-19 pneumonia in 1,524 patients with cancer (0.79%) in Wuhan (China); Aznab M [ 17 ] reported three cases of COVID-19 in 279 patients (1.08%) with solid tumors and hematologic malignances in Kermanshah (Iran); Moss C et al [ 18 ] reported nine positive cases amongh 654 cancer patients (1.38%) that were swabbed for COVID-19 in London. More recently, Aschele C et al [ 19 ], in a large multi-institutional retrospective study in Italy, reported the incidence of COVID-19 among 59,989 patients undergoing active antitumor treatment, between January 15, 2020 and May 4, 2020: 406 (0.68%) developed COVID-19 and 77% required hospitalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hospitals have developed algorithms and flow-charts to determine the need for surgical intervention or have utilized less invasive surgical techniques to minimize the length of hospital stay [ [159] , [160] , [161] ]. Additional protocols and have been effectively implemented to minimize the risk of COVID-19 transmission [ 162 , 163 ].…”
Section: Sars-cov-2 Infection Of the Nervous Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the patients (60%) were infected with CVID-19 in the last three months of the study. While in the rst trimester of the pandemic, the number of patients with Covid-19 was only 7, due to the observance of hygienic principles and adherence to self-care education [1].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the category of patients with hematologic malignancy, patients with acute leukemia need more attention [1,9,17]. Therefore, in this group, the rst priority should be on prevention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%