Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Systems and Network Telemetry and Analytics 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3391812.3396272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Network Performance Prediction for Scientific Facilities

Abstract: Large data transfers are getting more critical with the increasing volume of data in scientific computing. While scientific facilities manage dedicated infrastructures to support large data transfers, predicting network performance based on the historical measurement would be essential for workflow scheduling and resource allocation in the facility. In this study, we empirically evaluate deep learning (DL) models with respect to the prediction accuracy of network performance for scientific facilities, using a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification mechanism consists of two phases: assigning binary classification labels for each time window (anomalous or not) and performing actual classification by constructing a supervised learning model using the assigned label information. Another study in [22] evaluated deep learning models, including multilayer perceptron (MLP), convolutional neural network (CNN), gated recurrent unit (GRU), and long short-term memory (LSTM), in order to predict network performance (aggregated throughput) for each time interval. While these studies focused on analyzing tstat data based on time windows, our study focuses on connection-level prediction.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification mechanism consists of two phases: assigning binary classification labels for each time window (anomalous or not) and performing actual classification by constructing a supervised learning model using the assigned label information. Another study in [22] evaluated deep learning models, including multilayer perceptron (MLP), convolutional neural network (CNN), gated recurrent unit (GRU), and long short-term memory (LSTM), in order to predict network performance (aggregated throughput) for each time interval. While these studies focused on analyzing tstat data based on time windows, our study focuses on connection-level prediction.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification mechanism consists of two phases, the first phase assigning binary classification labels for each time window (either anomalous or not), and the second phase performing actual classification by constructing a supervised learning model using the assigned label information. Another study in [11] performed the evaluation of deep learning models, including Multilayer perceptron (MLP), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), in order to predict throughput for each time interval. While these studies focused on analyzing tstat data based on time windows, our study focuses on the connection-level prediction.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%