2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of different covariance models for the operational interpolation of high resolution satellite Sea Surface Temperature data over the Mediterranean Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our previous experience with satellite sea surface temperature interpolation showed that even if OI can reduce the level of noise in L4 fields (depending on the signal covariance characteristic scales, OI actually works also as a smoother), it is much more efficient to work with a slightly smaller amount of data of high quality, rather than including suspicious data into an analysis system (Buongiorno Nardelli et al, 2003;Marullo et al, 2007;Buongiorno Nardelli et al, 2010;Buongiorno Nardelli et al, 2013;Buongiorno Nardelli et al, 2015). Outliers found in proximity of data gaps, in particular, have a dramatic impact on the accuracy of the retrieval and are better removed before carrying out any interpolation.…”
Section: 4 Input Data Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous experience with satellite sea surface temperature interpolation showed that even if OI can reduce the level of noise in L4 fields (depending on the signal covariance characteristic scales, OI actually works also as a smoother), it is much more efficient to work with a slightly smaller amount of data of high quality, rather than including suspicious data into an analysis system (Buongiorno Nardelli et al, 2003;Marullo et al, 2007;Buongiorno Nardelli et al, 2010;Buongiorno Nardelli et al, 2013;Buongiorno Nardelli et al, 2015). Outliers found in proximity of data gaps, in particular, have a dramatic impact on the accuracy of the retrieval and are better removed before carrying out any interpolation.…”
Section: 4 Input Data Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of methods includes the single EOF reconstruction method (Carnes et al, 1990(Carnes et al, , 1994, the gravest empirical mode (Meinen & Watts, 2000) and the coupled pattern reconstruction (Buongiorno Nardelli & Santoleri, 2004), and the multivariate EOF reconstruction (mEOF-R) method (Buongiorno Nardelli & Santoleri, 2005;Buongiorno Nardelli et al, 2006;Wang et al, 2012). The mEOF-R method still presents a good performance in recent works to reconstruct the mixed layer depth (Buongiorno Nardelli et al, 2017) and ageostrophic motion (Buongiorno Nardelli et al, 2018) in the Southern Ocean. Occasionally, statistical modes could correspond to physical processes, for instance, the first mEOF of steric height could reflect the first baroclinic mode in Buongiorno Nardelli et al (2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NEMO model is one-way nested with the CMEMS Mediterranean Sea operational model (the Mediterranean Forecasting System; Oddo et al 2014) that provides the lateral boundary conditions (LBCs). The satellite level-4 SST product from CMEMS (Buongiorno Nardelli et al 2013) is ingested into the model through the adjustments of surface heat flux by means of a Newtonian relaxation algorithm. The relaxation coefficient is equal to 260 W m 22 K 21 at nighttime, and gently decreases to 210 W m 22 K 21 at noon because of the use of nighttime measurements only in the production of the SST analysis.…”
Section: A Observational Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(MetOp-B, MODIS, Suomi NPP) and processed by CMEMS (Buongiorno Nardelli et al 2015). Only nighttime measurements are considered, in order not to compromise the scores with possible misrepresentation of the diurnal cycle by the ocean model with respect to the satellite skin SST.…”
Section: Impact On Skill Score Verification Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%