2021
DOI: 10.1007/s41365-021-00888-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of different Krylov subspace methods for simulation of the water faucet problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The residual (fragment) cross sections in nuclear spallation reactions are key data for applications such as nuclear physics, radiation damage to electronics and radio-protection of astronauts [1], extraterrestrial body history via the radioisotopes produced inside [2], tracing the transport history of cosmic rays and abundances of Li, Be and B elements [3,4], neutron source or radioactive isotope beams like the China Spallation Neutron Source facility [5], the Beijing rare ion beam facility [6] and accelerator-driven system (ADS) [7,8], and even in situ proton therapy tomography [9,10]. Traditional methods to predict residual productions in spallation reactions include transport models such as quantum molecular dynamics (QMD) [11][12][13], the statistical muti-fragmentation model (SMM) [14][15][16], the Liège intranuclear cascade (INC) [17][18][19] model, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The residual (fragment) cross sections in nuclear spallation reactions are key data for applications such as nuclear physics, radiation damage to electronics and radio-protection of astronauts [1], extraterrestrial body history via the radioisotopes produced inside [2], tracing the transport history of cosmic rays and abundances of Li, Be and B elements [3,4], neutron source or radioactive isotope beams like the China Spallation Neutron Source facility [5], the Beijing rare ion beam facility [6] and accelerator-driven system (ADS) [7,8], and even in situ proton therapy tomography [9,10]. Traditional methods to predict residual productions in spallation reactions include transport models such as quantum molecular dynamics (QMD) [11][12][13], the statistical muti-fragmentation model (SMM) [14][15][16], the Liège intranuclear cascade (INC) [17][18][19] model, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%