2014
DOI: 10.21608/ijci.2014.33964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Differential Evolution and Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithms at Training of Neural Network for prediction

Abstract: This paper presents the comparison of two metaheuristic approaches: Differential Evolution (DE) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) in the training of feed-forward neural network to predict the daily stock prices. Stock market prediction is the act of trying to determine the future value of a company stock or other financial instrument traded on a financial exchange. The successful prediction of a stock's future price could yield significant profit. The feasibility, effectiveness and generic nature of both D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like the GA, DE utilizes the selection, crossover, and mutation operators. A significant difference in generating better solutions is that the GAs rely on the crossover operator whereas the DE algorithms rely on the mutation operation as the main operator (Abdual‐Salam, Abdul‐Kader, & Abdel‐Wahed, ). In DE, population size, crossover fraction, and generations are 80, 0.7, and 100, respectively.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Like the GA, DE utilizes the selection, crossover, and mutation operators. A significant difference in generating better solutions is that the GAs rely on the crossover operator whereas the DE algorithms rely on the mutation operation as the main operator (Abdual‐Salam, Abdul‐Kader, & Abdel‐Wahed, ). In DE, population size, crossover fraction, and generations are 80, 0.7, and 100, respectively.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PSO is derived from the behavior of social groups such as bird flocks or fish swarms (Abdual‐Salam et al, ). The basics of PSO can briefly be summarized as follows.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This influences the accuracy of the predicted results of ANN. To cope with this problem, a new method using the evolutionary algorithms is proposed in some researches [5], [12]- [14]. Kim and Han [15] used a genetic algorithm to transform continuous input values into discrete ones.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OSELM has been used in a variety of research fields, including power quality event detection (Sahani et al 2020), time series analysis (Das et al 2019), and stream flow forecasting (Lima et al 2017), and has outperformed basic ELM and other ML techniques as well. Several researchers have addressed the second issue by hybridizing the training of ELM using optimization techniques such as particle swarm optimization (PSO) (Pradeepkumar and Ravi 2017), harmony search (HS) (Dash et al 2014), grey wolf optimization (GWO) (Liu et al 2021), teachinglearning-based optimization (TLBO) (Das and Padhy 2018), crow search algorithm (CSA) (Dash et al 2021), differential evolution (DE) (Abdual-Salam et al 2010), and others. These models not only increase accuracy, but also enhance stability of the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%