2024
DOI: 10.4103/0972-1282.194953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of direct sensitivity testing as a method for early initiation of treatment in Gram-negative sepsis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly in Gram negative isolates it was Escherichia coli followed by Klebsiella species. The isolate rate in case of gram negative bacteria was similar to the previously reported studies 10,18,19 . Among gram negative bacteria, imipenem and meropenem showed lesser resistance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly in Gram negative isolates it was Escherichia coli followed by Klebsiella species. The isolate rate in case of gram negative bacteria was similar to the previously reported studies 10,18,19 . Among gram negative bacteria, imipenem and meropenem showed lesser resistance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…There was a contradiction in many other studies, that gram positive isolates was higher than gram negative isolates 11,19 . In the study done by fay and Oldfather , method of standardisation of inoculum was directly on the blood samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%