2015
DOI: 10.1177/1464420715595652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of dissimilar joints properties of 5083-H12 and 6061-T6 aluminum alloys produced by tungsten inert gas and friction stir welding

Abstract: In the present study, friction stir welding (FSW) and tungsten inert gas (TIG) techniques were used to join the dissimilar aluminum alloys of 5083-H12 and 6061-T6. The laboratory tests were designed using design of experiment (DOE) method. Variables for the FSW process were the rotational speed, traverse speed, shoulder diameter, and pin diameter. They changed in ranges of 700-2500 r/min, 25-400 mm/min, 10-14 mm, and 2-4 mm, respectively. In the case of TIG process, the variables were current intensity, traver… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is therefore necessary to select the appropriate combination of tool rotation and welding speed for a defect free joint with a good metallurgical bond and mechanical properties. As it can be seen in Table 1, quite a lot of papers have focused on the optimization of these parameters for different combinations of Al alloys [23,29,32,33,35,36,41,42,50,54,55,58,64,80]. welding speed for a defect free joint with a good metallurgical bond and mechanical properties.…”
Section: Tool Rotation and Welding Speedsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore necessary to select the appropriate combination of tool rotation and welding speed for a defect free joint with a good metallurgical bond and mechanical properties. As it can be seen in Table 1, quite a lot of papers have focused on the optimization of these parameters for different combinations of Al alloys [23,29,32,33,35,36,41,42,50,54,55,58,64,80]. welding speed for a defect free joint with a good metallurgical bond and mechanical properties.…”
Section: Tool Rotation and Welding Speedsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A substantial amount of Mg‐rich β ‐phase precipitates (Al 3 Mg 2 ) and the existence of Mn, Fe rich particles were seen on the grain boundaries. Commonly, the β ‐phase is stimulated by cold working . The β ‐phase particles are strongly anodic with the Al–Mg sloid‐solution matrix and dissolve in saline environments rapidly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since work‐hardening attains the strength of AA5083 Al–Mg alloy, heat input during welding causes loss of strain hardening effects. It leads to recrystallization and softening in heat affected zone (HAZ), and thus affects joint characteristics . These issues can be minimized by controlling the heat input using newly developed joining processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is usually due to the incorrect selection of welding parameters such as imprecise tool rotation speed, advancing speed, pin and shoulder diameters, tilt angle, preheat temperature, tool rotation direction (clockwise or counter clockwise), fixture and clamping system, tool geometry, etc. [1][2][3][4] . A flawless joint can only be obtained by selecting welding parameters in a limited range; otherwise, mechanical properties will suffer significantly 5,6) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, tungsten carbide (WC) particles were observed in the cross-section of the specimen welded by a higher rotation speed resulting in a lower joint ductility. Ghafarpour et al 2) joined 5083-H12 and 6061-T6 aluminum alloy sheets by FSW and optimized welding parameters including tool rotation speed, advancing speed, pin diameter, and shoulder diameter using design of experiment (DOE). They also determined a safe range for every parameter by performing limiting dome height (LDH) tests on the welded specimens and could maximize the formability of welded joints by optimizing the welding parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%