2017
DOI: 10.1007/s40999-017-0158-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Ductility of RC Structures Constructed with Bubble Deck System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the evaluation of the F y , it was considered the results of Figure . According to the obtained results for μ , indicated in Table , the ductility performance of the tested slabs, with values ranging from 1.51 to 2.65, was smaller than the value of three recommended elsewhere, which indicates a smaller performance in terms of ductility.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the evaluation of the F y , it was considered the results of Figure . According to the obtained results for μ , indicated in Table , the ductility performance of the tested slabs, with values ranging from 1.51 to 2.65, was smaller than the value of three recommended elsewhere, which indicates a smaller performance in terms of ductility.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…According to these studies, a ductility performance μ > 3 was recommended for BD slabs. 3 Some theoretical and experimental research have also suggested the BD RC slabs can be regarded, from the design point of view, as solid RC slabs, but the available recommendations are of empirical nature, and are based on very few experimental results, consisting as reducing the punching capacity of the corresponding solid RC slab in a factor that is around 40%. 4,5 Therefore, reliable information is still scarce for assessing the level of "appropriateness" of the suggested recommendations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Structural systems, and members thereof, should be designed under service loads to have enough stiffness to limit deflections, lateral drift, vibration, or any other deformations that adversely affect the intended use and performance of buildings and other structures based on the requirements outlined in the applicable codes and standards, or as specified in the project design criteria (Hashemi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Strength and Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model has been used to analyze different types of RC members such as beams, columns, shear walls, and deck systems. Hashemi et al [20] used this method to model bubble deck systems. In the fiber theory, the RC member is divided into several sub-elements which are composed of parallel layers.…”
Section: Smith and Vantsiotismentioning
confidence: 99%