2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11629-020-6255-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of effective spectral features for glacial lake mapping by using Landsat-8 OLI imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Visual interpretation method can be used to accurately delineate glacier lake boundaries, but these methods are time-consuming, laborious, costly, and the corresponding subjective factors are relatively large; thus, these methods are not suitable for mapping glacial lakes or conducting dynamic monitoring research in remote or large-scale regions. Thus, many automatic extraction methods have emerged for delineating water bodies, such as classification methods [22,23], threshold segmentation methods [24][25][26][27][28], machine learning methods [29][30][31][32], and other improved methods [33,34] (e.g., methods in which classification tree-based image segmentation and object-oriented spatial metrics are implemented to improve existing water body indices). However, it is still difficult to distinguish glacial lakes or their boundaries in some images due to the small sizes of lakes, lakes being shadowed by steep terrain, or lakes being ice-covered or snow-covered; these factors can change dramatically over a year or even over several months [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual interpretation method can be used to accurately delineate glacier lake boundaries, but these methods are time-consuming, laborious, costly, and the corresponding subjective factors are relatively large; thus, these methods are not suitable for mapping glacial lakes or conducting dynamic monitoring research in remote or large-scale regions. Thus, many automatic extraction methods have emerged for delineating water bodies, such as classification methods [22,23], threshold segmentation methods [24][25][26][27][28], machine learning methods [29][30][31][32], and other improved methods [33,34] (e.g., methods in which classification tree-based image segmentation and object-oriented spatial metrics are implemented to improve existing water body indices). However, it is still difficult to distinguish glacial lakes or their boundaries in some images due to the small sizes of lakes, lakes being shadowed by steep terrain, or lakes being ice-covered or snow-covered; these factors can change dramatically over a year or even over several months [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El uso del índice Kappa en este estudio tiene el fin de enriquecer la evaluación de exactitud de las clasificaciones. Aunque este índice sea discutido (Pontius y Millones, 2011), varias investigaciones actuales emplean el índice Kappa como referencia para la validación del mapeo de áreas con cobertura glaciar (e.g., López-Moreno et al, 2020;Sood et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Evaluación De La Exactitud De La Clasificaciónunclassified
“…Feature F 3 refers to the water index. Due to the simplicity of the expression and relatively stable thresholds used for the classification of lakes [13,37], NDWI was selected in this study, as follows:…”
Section: Water Attention Modulementioning
confidence: 99%