2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-05822013000400010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of employees in public day care centers knowledge about breastfeeding and complementary feeding

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the knowledge of public day care centers employees about breastfeeding and complementary feeding. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 15 public day care centers randomly selected in the city of Uberlandia, Southeast Brazil. A questionnaire applied to school principals, teachers, educators and general services assistants (GSA) included demographic and socioeconomic variables and questions about knowledge on breastfeeding, complementary feeding besides employees' perceptions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the strengths of the study is that it is the first study to explore this subject in Lebanon. Furthermore, in several previous studies on the topic [34,35,40,41,46], the main research question centered around knowledge and attitude of daycare centers' staff or policies supporting breastfeeding continuation in DCCs. Our study took a broader perspective, guided by an extensive theoretical framework, and included the interrelationships of relevant factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the strengths of the study is that it is the first study to explore this subject in Lebanon. Furthermore, in several previous studies on the topic [34,35,40,41,46], the main research question centered around knowledge and attitude of daycare centers' staff or policies supporting breastfeeding continuation in DCCs. Our study took a broader perspective, guided by an extensive theoretical framework, and included the interrelationships of relevant factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%