2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecmx.2022.100193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of energy management strategies for fuel cell/battery-powered underwater vehicles against field trial data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FC stack in our simulation is represented as a hydrogen PEM‐FC. For this purpose, a generic FC model was utilized, which comes pre‐loaded with parameters for a 1.26 kW (24 Vdc) PEM‐FC 36 . The Wind and Tidal Turbine blocks were employed to model the steady‐state power characteristics of both wind and tidal turbines.…”
Section: Numerical Testing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The FC stack in our simulation is represented as a hydrogen PEM‐FC. For this purpose, a generic FC model was utilized, which comes pre‐loaded with parameters for a 1.26 kW (24 Vdc) PEM‐FC 36 . The Wind and Tidal Turbine blocks were employed to model the steady‐state power characteristics of both wind and tidal turbines.…”
Section: Numerical Testing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, a generic FC model was utilized, which comes pre-loaded with parameters for a 1.26 kW (24 Vdc) PEM-FC. 36 The Wind and Tidal Turbine blocks were employed to model the steady-state power characteristics of both wind and tidal turbines. It is important to note that the drive train's stiffness is considered infinite, and to accurately represent the system, the friction factor and inertia of the turbine are combined with those of the permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG) coupled to the turbine.…”
Section: Numerical Testing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%