1996
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(96)76518-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Equations Based on Animal Factors to Predict Intake of Lactating Holstein Cows

Abstract: The accuracy of seven DMI prediction equations based only on animal factors was evaluated with 11 independent data files. Mean square prediction error was used to compare equation accuracy, which was considered to be unsatisfactory when the square root of the mean square prediction error was greater than +/-20% of the observed mean DMI. Robust intake equations that have a tolerable level of prediction errors for most data files would be less risky for practical use than models that are highly accurate for some… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accuracy was greatest at the intermediate feeding levels. The threshold of 0.10 error as suggested by Fuentes-Pila et al (1996) where there is a poor fit between actual and predicted values was not exceeded for any animals in the data set.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accuracy was greatest at the intermediate feeding levels. The threshold of 0.10 error as suggested by Fuentes-Pila et al (1996) where there is a poor fit between actual and predicted values was not exceeded for any animals in the data set.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Fitness was defined as the size of the mean prediction error (MPE) of actual compared with predicted milk yields, the smaller the better as outlined by Fuentes-Pila et al (1996). Mayer et al (2001) recommends a population size of approximately twice the dimensionality of the problem, but not too small to ensure genetic diversity.…”
Section: Evolutionary Algorithm Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RPE is an expression of the RMSE as a percentage of the actual data. According to Fuentes-Pila et al (1996), a RPE <10% indicates a satisfactory prediction, between 10% and 20% a relatively acceptable prediction, and an RPE >20% suggests a poor model prediction. In this study, the RMSE and RPE were used on the comparison of the different sub cattle at the lactation week scale.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, models are considered robust for practical use if they have a satisfactory level of accuracy for most data sets (RPE ⩽ 10%) rather than high accuracy for some data sets and poor accuracy for others (Fuentes-Pila et al, 1996;Keady et al, 2004). An RPE of ⩽10% is achievable for models predicting DMI of dairy cows in confined systems of milk production (Zom et al, 2012) but is very difficult to achieve for models predicting GDMI of grazing dairy cows (Delagarde and O' Donovan, 2005).…”
Section: Adaptation Of Grazein Model For Grazing Dairy Cowsmentioning
confidence: 99%