2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of experimental testing methods for the design of permeable friction course mixtures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Schellenberg draindown experiment procedure is done as reported, and the ASTM wire basket method is the most recommended. 40 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Schellenberg draindown experiment procedure is done as reported, and the ASTM wire basket method is the most recommended. 40 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this test, an ASTM wire basket, a Japanese criterion test pan, or a German and Chinese criterion beaker was generally used as the standard testing container. The Schellenberg draindown experiment procedure is done as reported, and the ASTM wire basket method is the most recommended …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of the test lies in the determination of the amount of binder drained from a bituminous mixture after being subjected to a higher temperature than the mixing temperature. Based on literature data found, the binder drainage expressed in percentage does not exceed the limit of 0.3% [9]. According to the test [60], a non-compacted OGFC sample was prepared and placed in a beaker that was weighted.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Open graded Friction Courses (OGFCs) help to mitigate the noise generated by the path of the vehicles and to decrease the risk of hydroplaning and wet skidding [1]. Other advantages include the reduction of the urban heat island effect [8] and the decrease of the accident rate due to the improved visibility, especially in wet weather conditions [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from traditional pavements, they have large porosity, which can form permeable channels and allow stormwater to pass through the surface layer (Kamali et al, 2017). They also have good texture depth, which can reduce noise and increase the friction between the wheel and the pavement (Wu et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2019a). Because all structural layers are permeable, rainwater can seep into the ground (Saadeh et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%