Evaluation of Extraction Methods for Clinical Metagenomic Assay

Abstract

(1) Background: Clinical metagenomics is a promising approach that helps to identify etiological agents in cases of unknown infections. For the efficient detection of an unknown pathogen, the extraction method must be carefully selected for the maximum recovery of nucleic acid from different microorganisms. The aim of this study was to evaluate different extraction methods that have the ability to isolate nucleic acids from different types of pathogens with good quality and quantity for efficient use in clinical metagenomic identification. (2) Methods: A mock sample spiked with five different pathogens was used for the comparative evaluation of different commercial extraction kits. Extracted samples were subjected to library preparation and run on MiSeq. The selected extraction method based on the outcome of the comparative evaluation was used subsequently for the nucleic acid isolation of all infectious agents in clinical respiratory samples with multiple infections. (3) Results: The protocol using the PowerViral® Environmental RNA-DNA Isolation Kit with a 5-min bead beating step achieved the best results with a low starting volume. The analysis of the tested clinical specimens showed the ability to successfully identify different types of pathogens. (4) Conclusions: The optimized extraction protocol in this study is recommended for clinical metagenomics application in specimens with multiple infections from different taxa.

Narrative review of application of metagenomic approaches to study the link between oropharyngeal microbiome and infectious diseases

“…Indeed, the different articles obtained in this review show that the results are sometimes different from one metagenomic study to another. This can be due to the different methodology (extraction kits, variable region chosen, metagenomic approaches) and samples type used (Farraj et al, 2020). The difference could also be due to factors that influence the variation of microbial diversity such as differences in climate, nutrition style or certain environmental factors (Catania et al, 2021;Panthee et al, 2022).…”

Lumbar infection caused by Mycobacterium paragordonae: A case report

“…Next-generation sequencing technology, such as metagenomic next-generation sequencing, allows thousands to billions of DNA fragments to be sequenced independently and simultaneously and is now a widely used technique in microbial testing. Because almost all pathogens contain DNA or RNA genomes, metagenomic next-generation sequencing of unidentified pathogens is now becoming an important test for definitive diagnosis[ 20 , 21 ]. As demonstrated by this case, such rare and slow-growing pathogens are easily overlooked by ordinary bacterial culture methods due to their slow growth; therefore, metagenomic next-generation sequencing can be an important test for clinical diagnosis in addition to prolonging the culture time.…”

Oral Microbiome as a Tool of Systemic Disease on Cleft Patients: A New Landscape

“…Machorowska-Pieniążek et al et al published higher levels of both pathogens, while Sundell et al published lower levels of the same pathogens. Although both groups studied gingival samples [ 28 ], some of the differences between them were the cleft type and the age of the subjects studied. Machorowska-Pieniążek et al studied zero to 90 days old CP with CL patients, while Sundell et al studied five years old CP with or without CL patients.…”