Evaluation of F, Ca, and P release and microhardness of eleven ion-leaching restorative materials and the recharge efficacy using a new Ca/P containing fluoride varnish

Ruengrungsom, Chirayu; Burrow, Michael F.; Parashos, Peter; Palamara, Joseph E.A.

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103474

Cited by 47 publications

(43 citation statements)

References 53 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…On observing the obtained results, there was no statistically significant difference between both groups. composite resins, and absence of glass matrix and bioactive components in its composition, which was in agreement with Ruengrungsom et al [31]. However, the result of the study was in contrast to a previous study [32], which reported that ACTIVA™ showed negligible calcium ion release after 24 h and after 28 days.…”

Section: Wear Resistancesupporting

confidence: 90%

Remineralization potential and mechanical evaluation of a bioactive glass containing composite (An ex vivo study)

Hussein

Refai

Alian

2021

Open Access Maced J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the remineralization ability, ion release, microshear bond strength and wear resistance of a claimed bioactive restorative material (ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative, Pulpdent Corporation, Watertown, USA) with the conventional resin composite (Filtek Z350 XT, 3M ESPE Elipar, Germany). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The remineralization ability was evaluated after 28 days using Energy Dispersive X-Ray (EDX) analysis. Ion release was investigated at three-time intervals: 1, 14 and 28 days. Calcium and phosphate ions release were determined by using ion chromatography system. Microshear bond strength was assessed using Universal Testing Machine. A wear test was conducted using a dual axis chewing simulator. RESULTS: ACTIVA™ was found to induce remineralization to the demineralized dentin. Results revealed that ACTIVA™ released Ca2+ and PO4-3 ions, whilst Filtek Z350 XT did not. Concerning microshear bond strength ACTIVA™ without adhesive application showed unacceptable failure. Regarding wear resistance there was no statistically significant difference between them. CONCLUSION: ACTIVA™ bioactive restorative material seems promising bioactive restorative materials. Clinical trials are recommended to compare clinical performance of ACTIVA™ with the other restorative materials.

show abstract

Section: Wear Resistancesupporting

confidence: 90%

Remineralization potential and mechanical evaluation of a bioactive glass containing composite (An ex vivo study)

Hussein

Refai

Alian

2021

Open Access Maced J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In Fujii II LC the hydrophilic poly-hydroxyethyl methacrylate probably absorbs sufficient water to enable diffusion of fluoride ions that may otherwise be firmly encapsulated within the polyacrylate matrix with high calcium and phosphorous release in comparison to glass ionomer [24]. Also, these results are in acceptance to Ruengrungsom et al (2020).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Fluoride-containing restorative materials gained great attention. Fluoride decreases caries activity by being a bacteriostatic and by decreasing the solubility of enamel and dentin through its integration into tooth tissue to form a more decay-resistant fluoroapatite [2]. Moreover, it aids to remineralize defected tooth structure after demineralization.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Restorative Material versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Cervical Restorations: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Yehia

Ibrahim

Abouauf

et al. 2022

Open Access Maced J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract: Objective: In the context of great attention given to fluoride containing restorative material and development of easily applied and reliable material for different clinical situations. This current study aimed to compare Bioactive resin-based composite (ACTIVA) to Resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) in cervical restorations. Materials and methods: Fuji II LC® capsules (conventional resin modified glass ionmer), or ACTIVA™ BioACTIVE-RESTORATIVE™ (enhanced resin-modified glass-ionmer) with using Etch-Rite™ and Prime&Bond universal (universal adhesive system) were applied randomly in thirty anterior teeth and six premolars with class V cavities; all materials were applied according to manufacturers’ instructions. Restorations were evaluated at baseline (one week), after six months, and after 12 months by two blinded assessors using modified USPHS criteria. Results: The results in this study were ordinal data, so Mann-Whitney test was used to compare between tested materials. Freidman test was used to test the effect of time within tested materials. Kruskal Wallis test used to compare the interaction between variables for all tested parameters. The results were statistically significant when p≤0.05. There was no significant difference between interaction of both restorations and time in marginal discoloration (p=0.051), recurrent caries (p=1.00) and retention analysis (p=1.00), but there was a significant change in marginal adaptation (p=0.001), surface roughness (p=0.017), color change (p= 0.004) and surface luster (p=0.017) with 100 % survival rate in this study. Conclusions: Both conventional resin-modified glass ionmer and enhanced resin-modified glass ionomer are acceptable as intermediate restoration. Bioactive restorations proved to retain its esthetic characteristics over the conventional one. Bioactive restorations with an adhesive system can be used as long-term restoration in small-defined cavities, not in stress-bearing areas. Clinical relevance: Within the limitations of this study, ACTIVA BIO-ACTIVE Restorative showed similar results to FUJI II LC in class V cavity restorations.

show abstract

“…The gel layer formed does not function as a protector due to the open silica network allowing deeper penetration of water, causing degradation of the bioactive resin which result in the higher release of calcium ions in the bioactive glass. 22 The immersion time also has a role in the ion release process. The longer the immersion is carried out, the greater the ion will be released.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Lactic Acid and Artificial Saliva Solution Immersion to the Release of Calcium Ions on Bioactive Resin

Puspitasari¹,

Tajjalia²,

Wibowo³

et al. 2021

Dentino

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Bioactive resin can release calcium ions when contact with solution media, even in acid condition. In the oral cavity, pH may change into acid condition due to the metabolic results of Streptococcus mutans. The bacteria metabolize carbohydrates into organic acids, one of which is lactic acid. Purpose: Analyze the effect of lactic acid solution and artificial saliva on the number of the release of calcium ions of bioactive resin. Methods: Forty-two specimens (diameter 15 mm x thickness 1 mm; n= 7/group fabricated with Activa™ Bioactive Restorative (Pulpdent). The specimens that meet the criteria were divided into 6 groups. The specimen was immersed for 1 and 7 days in the incubator at 37oC. The number of calcium ion release is measured using titration method. Results: Two Way Anova test and Post Hoc Bonferonni test showed there were significant differences among all group for lactic acid 1 day (4.040 ± 0.360) µg, artificial saliva 1 day (0.640 ± 0.338) µg, distilled water 1 day (1.040 ± 0.504) µg, lactic acid 7 days (5.400 ± 0.312), artificial saliva 7 days (1.640 ± 0.215) µg, distilled water 7 days (3.520± 0.356 µg). Conclusion: There was an influence of lactic acid and artificial saliva on the number of calcium ion releases of bioactive resin. Immersion of bioactive resin in the lactic acid solution increase the calcium ion releases and artificial saliva decrease the calcium ion release compared to distilled water. Keywords: artificial saliva, bioactive resin, calcium ion release, lactic acid

show abstract

Evaluation of F, Ca, and P release and microhardness of eleven ion-leaching restorative materials and the recharge efficacy using a new Ca/P containing fluoride varnish

Cited by 47 publications

References 53 publications

Remineralization potential and mechanical evaluation of a bioactive glass containing composite (An ex vivo study)

Remineralization potential and mechanical evaluation of a bioactive glass containing composite (An ex vivo study)

Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Restorative Material versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Cervical Restorations: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The Effect of Lactic Acid and Artificial Saliva Solution Immersion to the Release of Calcium Ions on Bioactive Resin

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About