Evaluation of factors influencing the guide to read biomedical English literature course for Chinese new medical postgraduates—a multiple regression analysis

Abstract

Background There is a dearth of published literature that demonstrates the impact of a Guide to Reading Biomedical English Literature course on new Chinese medical postgraduates. Keeping this gap in mind, the objectives of this study were to assess the factors associated with course effectiveness using the teacher, postgraduate and organizational factors. Methods This study was conducted at Nanjing Medical University from December 2014 to December 2015. The participants were 440 new graduate students from different medical specialties. At baseline, each student was assessed for teacher factors, individual factors and organizational factors using a self-administered structured scored anonymous questionnaire. After that, Pearson chi-square analysis was conducted to evaluate the factors that impact teacher factors (knowledge level, teaching style, individualized teaching, logical teaching, heuristic teaching, literature difficulty, bilingual teaching), individual factors (gender, attitude toward studying, previewing literature, English literacy level) and course management (such as teaching objectives and assessment system) on this course. Furthermore, multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the impact of the above factors on our outcome variables (knowledge level, teaching style, individualized teaching, heuristic teaching, study attitude, previewing literature, management). Results Nearly all of the participants (420 of 440, 95.5%) thought this course was helpful for learning to read scientific literature and understanding scientific research design. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that the participants perception of the course as effective was associated with teachers’ high knowledge level (Adjusted Odds Ratio, AOR = 49.673; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI = 4.28, 575.90). In addition, heuristic teaching was found to be significantly associated with a positive teaching effect of teaching (AOR = 12.76; 95% CI = 1.78, 91.64). Furthermore, the participants perception of the course as effective was associated with positive attitude toward studying (AOR = 25.004; 95% CI = 2.51, 249.09). Previewing literature was also associated with course effectiveness (AOR = 0.02; 95% CI = 0.04, 0.11). Conclusions This study indicated that the course effectiveness of the Guide for Reading Biomedical English Literature was associated with i) teachers’ knowledge, ii) heuristic teaching, iii) students’ positive attitude, and iv) students’ previewing literature. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-019-1731-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Influential Factors on Technology-Based Learning in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering (SME): A Case-Analysis from 305 Studies

“…In previous studies, the effect size measured by odds ratio for the predictors turned to be at least 1.5 (Catalano, 2015;Xu et al, 2019;Yen & Liu, 2009). With this reference, did the estimation of the sample size using G*Power 3.1.9.4, in which four values of odds ratios (1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0) were set to calculate the minimum sample sizes, resulting in the sample sizes of 637, 225, 134, and 96 for the four odds ratios respectively.…”

Exploring Methods of the Sustainable Development for Safety Engineering International Course

“…Studies related to course effect in other fields involve the influence of various types of factors on course effect, such as teacher factors [42][43][44], teaching modes [45][46][47][48], etc. Some of the findings are consistent with this paper; for example, 95.5% of the people in Xu's study believed that appropriate course content was helpful for learning and research, and the course effect was related to the level of teachers [44]. This corroborates the findings of this study.…”

Social Media in Dynamic Learning: Logistics and Influential Factors

“…1, April, 2019 because all the predictors were assumed to enhance learning. For the effect size, we examined previous studies (Catalano, 2015;Xu et al, 2019;Yen & Liu, 2009) and estimated the effect size measured by odds ratio for the predictors to be at least 1.5. We expected that if the null hypothesis is true, the probability of an event (=success) under X=1 is .5.…”

“…Findings from Catalano (2015) showed that the odds ratio of transfer for a student in the situated learning environment to a student in the traditional instruction condition was 2.9. Xu et al (2019) studied the effect of teacher factors, individual factors, Volume 12, No. 1, April, 2019 and course management factors on student's perception of teaching effectiveness.…”

“…Their findings showed that teacher's knowledge level, heuristic teaching, times of preview literature, and student's study attitudes were significant predictors of teaching effectiveness. The odds ratios of the seven predictors in the logistic model ranged from 0.02 to 49.673 (Xu et al, 2019).…”