1998
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b3.0800441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of soft-tissue sarcomas

Abstract: We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate the ability of whole-body 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) to identify local recurrence and pulmonary metastases in patients with soft-tissue tumours after treatment. We compared the results of FDG PET with those of MRI for the detection of local recurrence, and with CT of the chest for pulmonary metastases.We assessed 62 patients of mean age 51 years, who had 15 types of soft-tissue sarcoma, after a mean follow-up of 3 years 2 mon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
49
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
49
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…FDG-PET can be useful in tumor grading but is, with the exception of a study of Eary et al, (17) not able to differentiate between benign lesions and low-grade sarcoma (16,17,31,32). The accuracy for the differentiation is influenced by technical limitations, time between injection and scanning, and false negative and false positive findings (18,21,22,26,29). The SUV for FDG-PET for low-grade (grade 1) STS varied between 1.6 and 2.6, as compared with 0.2 and 1.5 for FLT-PET; the SUV for FDG-PET for high-grade STS (grade 2 and 3) varied between 8.0 and 9.4 as compared with 0.8 and 4.9 for FLT-PET (23,29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FDG-PET can be useful in tumor grading but is, with the exception of a study of Eary et al, (17) not able to differentiate between benign lesions and low-grade sarcoma (16,17,31,32). The accuracy for the differentiation is influenced by technical limitations, time between injection and scanning, and false negative and false positive findings (18,21,22,26,29). The SUV for FDG-PET for low-grade (grade 1) STS varied between 1.6 and 2.6, as compared with 0.2 and 1.5 for FLT-PET; the SUV for FDG-PET for high-grade STS (grade 2 and 3) varied between 8.0 and 9.4 as compared with 0.8 and 4.9 for FLT-PET (23,29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last decade, the value of positron emission tomography (PET) in STS with several tracers, especially [ 18 F]fluoro-2Ј-deoxy-Dglucose (FDG), has been investigated (10 -16). However, the current potential of FDG-PET in the detection and/or grading is still unknown (10,11,15,(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fewer nodules encountered peroperatively are associated with a better MST (3,8). Five-and 10-year survival rates were found to be 43% and 31% in patients with solitary pulmonary metastasis, versus 27% and 19% in patients with 4 or more metastatic lesions, respectively (8). On the contrary, a few studies showed that there is no major correlation between the lesion count and survival (5,11,12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desmin is absent but focal reactivity for muscle specific actin or smooth muscle actin is noted on occasion in monophasic type. Zeren (19).…”
Section: Synovial Sarcoma Is the Third Most Common Histological Type mentioning
confidence: 99%