2010
DOI: 10.1145/1857893.1857894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of force and torque magnitude discrimination thresholds on the human hand-arm system

Abstract: This article reports on experiments about haptic perception aimed at measuring the force/torque differential thresholds applied to the hand-arm system. The experimental work analyzes how force is sent back to the user by means of a 6 degrees-of-freedom haptic device. Our findings on force perception indicate that the just-noticeable-difference is generally higher than previously reported in the literature and not constant along the stimulus continuum. We found evidence that the thresholds change also among the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
29
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No discrimination difference between the axes was found. A similar result was found using a range of force magnitudes in a discrimination task where subjects were holding a handle of a haptic device (Weber fraction: 15%) [10]. So, for the cardinal directions the mean Weber fraction for force magnitude seems to be 13-15%. Another parameter that can be investigated using discrimination experiments is the difference between force magnitude perception at different directions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No discrimination difference between the axes was found. A similar result was found using a range of force magnitudes in a discrimination task where subjects were holding a handle of a haptic device (Weber fraction: 15%) [10]. So, for the cardinal directions the mean Weber fraction for force magnitude seems to be 13-15%. Another parameter that can be investigated using discrimination experiments is the difference between force magnitude perception at different directions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…When the development of haptic devices began, research changed from looking only at force perception in the direction of gravity [4], [5], [6] to looking at it in three dimensions (e.g. [7], [8], [9], [10]). This also changed the term 'weight perception' to 'force perception'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study fitted exponential functions to its experimental data to model the JND versus reference force in each direction (Vicentini, Galvan, Botturi, & Fiorini, 2010;Botturi, Galvan, Vicentini, & Secchi, 2009):…”
Section: Modeling the Force Discrimination Ability Near Absolute Thrementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, all of the cited works and many other psychophysical studies such as Bau, Poupyrev, Israr, & Harrison (2010) estimated JNDs for forces big enough to follow Weber's law. Vicentini, Galvan, Botturi, & Fiorini, (2010) measured JNDs for different forces in a wide range and reported JND values of about 15% for forces that follow Weber's law, and JNDs of 32% and 23% for 0.5 N and 0.8 N. It was also postulated that the perception is asymmetric and varies in different directions. Another study (Hatzfeld & Werthschützky, 2012) measured JNDs of vibro-tactile forces near the absolute threshold of perception at different frequencies between 5 to 1000 Hz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation