2014
DOI: 10.3183/npprj-2014-29-04-p620-634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of future pulp mill concepts – Reference model of a modern Nordic kraft pulp mill

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…47%, a level that has remained unchanged for many years (Janson and Teder 1986;Gullichsen 1999;Kangas et al 2014). There is a theoretical potential for higher yields in view of the fact that softwoods contain around 70% polysaccharides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47%, a level that has remained unchanged for many years (Janson and Teder 1986;Gullichsen 1999;Kangas et al 2014). There is a theoretical potential for higher yields in view of the fact that softwoods contain around 70% polysaccharides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially in Nordic countries, wood raw material comprises up to 90% of the variable costs per produced air dry tonne of pulp and over half of the total production costs in a modern pulp mill (Kangas et al, 2014). Thus, savings from improved raw material utilisation and additional revenue from increased pulp production would be expected.…”
Section: The Halt Process As a Base Of A Biorefinery: Possibilities Amentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the pulp and paper industry, steady state simulation has been applied to optimize water consumption [20,21], minimize energy and utility consumption [22][23][24], and evaluate the chemical state of the process [25,26]. Kangas et al [27] defined a steady state simulation model of a kraft pulp mill and evaluated the economic feasibility of the process. In the field of biorefineries, steady state simulation has been used for process modelling and evaluating the economic performance of biomethane [28], bioethanol [29], biodiesel [30], and renewable diesel production [31].…”
Section: Steady State Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%