2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmap.2017.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of genetic stability and analysis of phytomedicinal potential in micropropagated plants of Rumex nepalensis – A medicinally important source of pharmaceutical biomolecules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The genetic changes experienced by the culture include: alternative DNA methylation, amplification, activation of transposable elements, polyploidy, changes in chromosome number or DNA sequence (Bairu et al 2011;Stanišic et al 2015;Govindaraju and Arulselvi 2016). Typically regeneration protocols involving a callus phase are considered the least reliable for clonal propagation, while plantlets regenerated by branching of the axillary buds or direct somatic embryos are considered to be, genetically, the most uniform (Rani and Raina 2000;Varshney et al 2001;Bhattacharyya et al 2017b). The occurrence of somaclonal variations during in vitro propagation, industrial production of phytochemicals, or genetically engineered plants can lead to massive economic consequences and represents a serious obstacle in the practical utilization of plant tissue culture techniques for the production of active metabolites (Rahman and Rajora 2001; ).…”
Section: Improvements In Traditional Culturing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genetic changes experienced by the culture include: alternative DNA methylation, amplification, activation of transposable elements, polyploidy, changes in chromosome number or DNA sequence (Bairu et al 2011;Stanišic et al 2015;Govindaraju and Arulselvi 2016). Typically regeneration protocols involving a callus phase are considered the least reliable for clonal propagation, while plantlets regenerated by branching of the axillary buds or direct somatic embryos are considered to be, genetically, the most uniform (Rani and Raina 2000;Varshney et al 2001;Bhattacharyya et al 2017b). The occurrence of somaclonal variations during in vitro propagation, industrial production of phytochemicals, or genetically engineered plants can lead to massive economic consequences and represents a serious obstacle in the practical utilization of plant tissue culture techniques for the production of active metabolites (Rahman and Rajora 2001; ).…”
Section: Improvements In Traditional Culturing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic fidelity analysis by SCoT and Ycf1 b DNA barcoding primers In vitro micropropagated plants are known to undergo somaclonal variations in several plant species irrespective of the cultural conditions, choice of explants, and PGRs used (Larkin and Scowcroft 1981;Goto et al 1998;Krishna et al 2016) leading to genetic instability, and validation of true-totype genetic homogeneity remains one of the important prerequisites (Lakshmanan et al 2007). Several molecular markers including RAPD, ISSR, and SSR (Bhattacharyya et al 2017;Tikendra et al 2019) have been extensively utilized for analyzing the clonal/genetic fidelity of micropropagated plants. A highly reproducible and novel molecular marker, start codon targeted (SCoT) marker, based on targeting the short consensus conserved region flanking the ATG translation start codon in plant genes (Collard and Mackill 2009), has been utilized in the present study, which can be correlated to expressible genes and their corresponding traits.…”
Section: Total Phenolics Flavonoids and Antioxidant Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combination and concentration of the applied auxin and cytokinine were reported to strongly influence the biosynthesis and accumulation of flavonoids in the cultured plant cell (Bota & Deliu, 2015). Plant tissue culture techniques have been applied to some Rumex species other than R. pictus such as R. vesicarius (Abo El-Soud et al, 2011;El-Shafey et al, 2016 andSayed et al, 2017), the hybrid sorrel Rumex tianschanicus x Rumex patientia (Ślesak et al, 2014), R cyprius (Al Khateeb et al, 2017) and R. nepalensis (Bhattacharyya et al, 2017). However, to our knowledge, there have been no previous reports investigating the in vitro culture of R. pictus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%