Evaluation of Genuine Savings in the Russia’s far East Regions

Pyzheva, Yulia I.; Lapo, Estalin Vladimir Arrobo; Сырцова, Екатерина Александровна; Pyzhev, Anton I.

doi:10.1134/s2079970521010111

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…(Bobylev et al, 2012). Альтернативный подход к расчету «истинных сбережений» с учетом открытых данных об истощении природных ресурсов, предоставляемых компаниями-недропользователями, развит и успешно применен для регионов Сибири и Дальнего Востока на самом длинном доступном временном горизонте в работах (Pyzheva et al, 2021;Syrtsova et al, 2016). Экологически скорректированные оценки валовых региональных продуктов выполнены в циклах работ Е. В. Рюминой с соавт.…”

Section: методыunclassified

Toward the Sustainable Development of Russian Regions: A Comprehensive Review of Empirical Research

Pyzheva¹,

Zander²,

Pyzhev³

2021

J. Sib. Fed. Univ., Humanit. soc. sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper provides a comprehensive review of empirical research on the sustainability of development of Russian regions. Methods of bibliometric analysis are used to achieve the set task. Samples of publications for substantive analysis are constructed using the leading academic databases: Scientific electronic library eLIBRARY.ru and its project Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI), Scopus, Web of Science. The results of the study show that despite the increasing public and political attention to the problems of sustainability, ecologization of the economy, improving the well-being of the population, there are few high-quality scientific studies that make a significant contribution to the analysis of sustainability of the Russian regions. Most of the research is of a staged or descriptive nature, and there are very few quantitative studies that are in such high demand on the modern international scientific market. For example, assessments of sustainability levels have covered only a small part of Russian regions over a very short period not exceeding five years on average, and using a very narrow range of tools. This is clearly insufficient for use as alternatives to traditional macroeconomic measures of well-being of territories, which significantly narrows the demand for these results in practice. The shortage of publications on the topic of sustainability of Russian regions can be perceived as a direction for the development of relevant research, opening new directions and even creating new teams

show abstract

Section: методыunclassified

Toward the Sustainable Development of Russian Regions: A Comprehensive Review of Empirical Research

Pyzheva¹,

Zander²,

Pyzhev³

2021

J. Sib. Fed. Univ., Humanit. soc. sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Recently, some studies of interactions between carbon emissions and energy use, real income, and education in Russia using the EKC approach have emerged [40]. Unfortunately, regional-and municipal-scale studies of ecological and economic issues are still rare [41][42][43][44], despite their obvious relevance for understanding the current state of the problem and efficient policymaking. Local-level studies are of crucial importance for large countries such as Russia, because of their pronounced spatial heterogeneity.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impacts of Energy Efficiency and Economic Growth on Air Pollutant Emissions: Evidence from Angara–Yenisey Siberia

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Environmental problems of urban and rural areas are now high on the agenda of industrialized countries, becoming a key challenge for regional-level policymaking. The mutual influence of population growth, economic and technological development, and the anthropogenic pressure on the environment is still insufficiently studied in many countries, including Russia. In this paper, this relationship is studied for the municipalities of Angara–Yenisey Siberia using an ensemble of the STIRPAT-like regression models, adapted according to the available data. We found that population size and gross municipal product were positively associated with pollutant emissions (p < 0.01), while energy efficiency had no significant impact on air pollution. In addition to the poor national data quality and completeness issues, which can distort statistical conclusions, the cause of the observed lack of spatial correlation between energy efficiency and air pollutant emissions may be path dependence and an insufficient pace of transition to a greener economy. This leaves room for institutional transformations aimed at intensifying energy efficiency to reduce the environmental burden.

show abstract

“…На протяжении последних десятилетий на эту тему было проведено много исследований и публиковано большое количество статей. Были разработаны различ-ные индикаторы, позволяющие сопоставить достигнутый уровень развития и связанное с ним негативное воздействие на окружающую среду и истощение природных ресурсов: «индекс устойчивого экономического благосостояния» (Armiento, 2018;Castaneda, 1999;Clarke, Islam, 2005;etc.), «истинные сбережения» (Lindmark et al, 2018;Syrtsova et al, 2016), «экологически скорректированный индекс человеческого развития» (Mkrtchyan et al, 2019;Ryumina, 2016), «индекс развития человеческого потенциала» и «индекс скорректированных чистых накоплений» (Bobylev et al, 2018;Pyzheva et al, 2021), «эко-интенсивность» (ЭИ) (De Haan, 2004;Glazyrina, Potravnyi et al, 2005;Zabelina, Deluga, 2019;etc.). Их анализ показывает большое разнообразие подходов, различие методик и их чувствительности к происходящим процессам, а также их возможностей для учета многообразия и специфики российских регионов.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Socio-Ecological Inequality in the Russian Federation and Problems of its Measurement

Глазырина¹,

Ras²,

Забелина³

2021

J. Sib. Fed. Univ., Humanit. soc. sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article discusses some approaches and specific ecological and economic indicators that, in the authors’ opinion, have been used more than others in decision-making procedures, in public discourse, and in analysis in connection with the problems of spatial development, including scientific analysis. They are also used for comparative spatial analysis of socio-economic inequality. These include eco-intensity and decoupling coefficients, indicators of per capita environmental pressure and socio-ecological and economic well-being based on the expanded A. Sen’s function calculated by region. It is also shown that the calculation of eco-intensity and decoupling without taking into account the accumulation of pollutants can cause a certain limitation of the potential of these indicators in the context of long-term consequences. The conclusion is justified that these tools for measuring socio-ecological inequality cannot be considered as interchangeable, and it is unlikely that «some are better than others». These indicators provide answers to various questions, and characterize the heterogeneity of socio-ecological conditions in the regions of Russia in different aspects. It seems more reasonable to use this tool as a whole, and apply its individual components depending on the specific tasks related to the spatial development of Russia

show abstract

Evaluation of Genuine Savings in the Russia’s far East Regions

Cited by 4 publications

References 6 publications

Toward the Sustainable Development of Russian Regions: A Comprehensive Review of Empirical Research

Toward the Sustainable Development of Russian Regions: A Comprehensive Review of Empirical Research

Impacts of Energy Efficiency and Economic Growth on Air Pollutant Emissions: Evidence from Angara–Yenisey Siberia

Socio-Ecological Inequality in the Russian Federation and Problems of its Measurement

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About